September 2017
Volume 17, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2017
Gaze behavior during the averted detection of a simulated faint star
Author Affiliations
  • Robert Alexander
    SUNY Downstate Medical Center
  • Ronald Mintz
    SUNY Downstate Medical Center
  • Paul Custodio
    SUNY Downstate Medical Center
  • Stephen Macknik
    SUNY Downstate Medical Center
  • Sofya Gindina
    SUNY Downstate Medical Center
  • Susana Martinez-Conde
    SUNY Downstate Medical Center
Journal of Vision August 2017, Vol.17, 1186. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Robert Alexander, Ronald Mintz, Paul Custodio, Stephen Macknik, Sofya Gindina, Susana Martinez-Conde; Gaze behavior during the averted detection of a simulated faint star. Journal of Vision 2017;17(10):1186.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Vision in daytime conditions relies on pointing one's fovea to successive targets of interest. Looking directly at visual targets may not be the best strategy to acquire information in nighttime conditions, however, because rods (which mediate night vision) are absent from the fovea. Here we explored the relationship between eye movements and perception in scotopic conditions, with a technique first proposed around 325 BC and still used today, known as "averted vision." Looking away from faint celestial objects, instead of directly at them, can improve their detection. The reason is thought to be that light falls on more rods as the objects approach ~20° of visual angle away from the center of gaze. No studies have determined the pattern of averted vision that best facilitates perception, however. We assessed averted vision while recording eye positions of dark-adapted human participants, for the first time. We used a CRT monitor and a series of three neutral density filters to create a centrally-placed dim artificial star, of apparent magnitude 4.2 (dimmer than Tau Ceti). After dark-adapting, participants (n=12) made eye movements to a series of fixation targets, viewed binocularly. Participants made a yes/no judgment about whether the star was visible at each fixation location. This provided a map of detection performance in all directions surrounding the star. If rod-cone distribution was the sole predictor of performance, we should have found peak performance 20° away from the star and a linear improvement as gaze approaches 20°. Contrary to this prediction, our participants' accuracy peaked around 10°, and decreased at greater distances. This work may provide a better understanding of rod function, and in turn lead to improved screening and assistive technologies for eye movement and night vision disorders.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2017


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.