The goal of the present study was to calculate the retinal light dose in a normal population randomly chosen from the Reykjavik Eye Study to test the hypothesis that long-axial length myopes receive a decreased light dose to their maculas compared with short-axial length hyperopes. Given that in vivo measurements of RLD in subjects are not possible, we used two methods to calculate RLD: a method using a one-surface schematic eye and the most important ocular refractive variables, and ray-tracing software and a more complete set of these variables. RLD is inversely proportional to axial length. Every millimeter decrease in axial length significantly increases RLD. The ray-tracing method indicated that the retina of a 21-mm axial length eye would always be receiving 1.8× more photons per square millimeter than a 27-mm axial length one.
Interestingly, in our example, the RLD for a hyperopic 21-mm eye wearing a pair of inexpensive commercial sunglasses (which filter approximately 40% of visible light
16) would be equivalent to the RLD received by a 27-mm myopic eye without sunglasses. Note that in the BDES, the protective effect of sunglasses and the wearing of hats was based on self-reporting their use more than 50% of the time, whereas in our examples, an eye of long axial length would be receiving the lower RLD 100% of the time owing to the constant presence of this anatomic feature. The BDES and POLA studies both failed to show a significant sun exposure–AMD association, although a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature exploring sunlight exposure–AMD risk has done that. In fact, the POLA study found just the opposite with subjects, whereby participants who reported higher exposure to sunlight also demonstrate fewer retinal pigmentary abnormalities and early signs of AMD. Darzins et al.
17 showed that sensitivity to glare and poor tanning ability were in fact markers for increased AMD risk, and hence, sun sensitivity could be regarded as a confounder in AMD–sun exposure studies. When the eye is exposed to bright light, pupils constrict, and a number of behavioral modifications occur including lid closing, gaze aversion, and the wearing of hats and sunglasses.
18 Calculating cumulative retinal light exposure from ambient exposure is fraught for the above reasons as some of above-mentioned confounders would be virtually impossible to measure. This uncertainty in ascertaining cumulative sunlight exposure and consequent retinal light dose with the different epidemiologic studies may explain their different conclusions. However, the calculation of the decrease in eye light exposure with the reported wearing of hats and sunglasses would be much simpler: the filtering capacity of the glass and the time spent wearing them outdoors being the determinants.
Nevertheless, our findings do not prove cause and effect for excess retinal light exposure and AMD association in this population (short axial length hyperopes), and they may represent a simple epiphenomenon. Alternate theories to explain increased AMD risk in short axial length hyperopes summarized by Pan et al.
19 include increased sclera rigidity, higher intraocular VEGF concentration, and lower incidence of posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) in these eyes. Although the higher incidence of spectacle wearing in the myopic population was also advanced as a reason for myopes to be protected from AMD, presumably by decreasing light exposure, spectacles do not filter
20 the short wave-length visible light that is felt to cause the most retinal damage.
21 Additionally, the epidemiology shows a consistent increase in AMD risk with increasing hypermetropia. We would expect an interruption in this trend if indeed glasses were playing a role in altering retinal light exposure in populations more likely to wear them (myopes and higher hyperopes).
5
Apart from placing a measuring device in the retinal plane to record light dose, we cannot be sure how much light is reaching the retina. However, we demonstrate in our model that an eye's RLD will be inversely proportional to its axial length. This same inversely proportional relationship has been noted for the epidemiology of AMD, with shorter axial length increasing AMD risk. Animal models
22 and the theoretical AMD disease mechanisms
23,24 all appear supportive of an AMD–light exposure link. Rather than invoke alternate hypotheses to explain the AMD–axial length relationship, the logical and parsimonious explanation for short axial length hyperopes being more at risk for AMD is excess light dose to the macula. Reflecting on the concept of the reciprocal nature of retinal phototoxicity,
17 the shorter the axial length the more frequently the retina would be exposed to toxic levels of light. If indeed this is the mechanism for increased risk of AMD in hyperopes, then it can be seen that relatively small decreases in macular light exposure could result in important risk reduction for AMD. We believe not only does our study provide an explanation for the protective effect of myopia in AMD but also an additional rationale for eye protection from light toxicity. It seems only logical that the use of sunglasses and hats should be strongly advocated, thereby decreasing light impinging on the macula and minimizing eye exposure to more damaging shorter wavelength
21 light, both indoors and outdoors.