September 2018
Volume 18, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2018
The Effect of Resolution on Guiding Visual Selective Attention is Contingent Upon Task-Relevance
Author Affiliations
  • Jared Peterson
    Psychological Sciences, Arts and Sciences, Kansas State University
  • Lester Loschky
    Psychological Sciences, Arts and Sciences, Kansas State University
Journal of Vision September 2018, Vol.18, 13. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jared Peterson, Lester Loschky; The Effect of Resolution on Guiding Visual Selective Attention is Contingent Upon Task-Relevance. Journal of Vision 2018;18(10):13. doi:

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

How does resolution guide attention? Previous studies have shown that unique clarity captures attention (Enns & MacDonald, 2013; Loschky & McConkie, 2002; Peterson & Loschky, submitted; Smith & Tadmor, 2012). But, what about blur? Peterson et al. (2017) found unique blur weakly repelled attention towards nearby clarity, whereas unique clarity strongly captured attention. Are these results explainable by resolution being a search asymmetry? If resolution is a search asymmetry, then making resolution task-relevant should replicate Peterson et al.'s asymmetric findings. However, if both blur and clarity can be selected for and used to efficiently guide attention, then resolution is not a search asymmetry, but instead depends upon its task-relevance. Experiment 1 manipulated task relevance in a rotated L versus T visual search task while measuring eye movements and reaction times. Resolution's task-relevance was manipulated with instructions (Use Blur, Use Clarity, Do Not Use Unique Blur or Clarity, and No Instructions) and probability (in a set size of 6, Task-relevant resolution singleton at target 67% (4/6), Task-irrelevant resolution singleton at target 17% (1/6) = chance). The results showed unique blur was strongly selected for when task-relevant, but weakly repelled attention toward nearby clarity when task-irrelevant. Experiment 2 asked if resolution is preattentively available when task-relevant. In two conditions, participants either searched for a blurred or clear T, amongst T distractors of the opposite resolution with set sizes 2, 4, and 8. The target present RT x Set Size search slopes for both blur and clarity were < 1 msec/item, suggesting that both are processed preattentively and resolution is not a search asymmetry. Overall, the results suggest resolution's influence on attention is contingent upon its task-relevance. When relevant, both blur and clarity are efficiently selected for and strongly guide attention. When task-irrelevant, unique clarity strongly captures attention, while unique blur weakly repels attention towards nearby clarity.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2018


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.