September 2018
Volume 18, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2018
Is Body Size Estimation Viewpoint Invariant?
Author Affiliations
  • Anne Thaler
    Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, TübingenMax Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, Tübingen
  • Isabelle Bülthoff
    Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen
  • Sergi Pujades
    Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, Tübingen
  • Michael Black
    Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, Tübingen
  • Betty Mohler
    Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, TübingenTechnical University Darmstadt
Journal of Vision September 2018, Vol.18, 165. doi:10.1167/18.10.165
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Anne Thaler, Isabelle Bülthoff, Sergi Pujades, Michael Black, Betty Mohler; Is Body Size Estimation Viewpoint Invariant?. Journal of Vision 2018;18(10):165. doi: 10.1167/18.10.165.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Previous research on own body size estimation has only looked at estimates made by comparing own body size to a test body in front view (e.g., Mölbert et al. 2017). However, people constantly see and compare themselves to bodies in different viewpoints. Depending on the viewpoint, shape cues potentially used to judge body size, such as the waist-to-hip ratio or the overall body outline, vary. Here, we asked whether viewpoint influences estimates of own body size in female participants. For each participant, a personalized female avatar was generated using weight, height, inseam, and arm span, and then variations of the personalized avatar having different weights (±5%, ±10%, ±15%, ±20%, and ±25%) were created using a statistical body model. These eleven test bodies were presented in life-size in immersive virtual reality in six viewpoints: 0°, ±45°, ±90°, 180°. In a one-alternative forced choice paradigm, participants were asked to judge whether the test body was thinner or fatter than themselves. Results showed no significant influence of viewpoint on either the accuracy of body size estimation (PSE) or the sensitivity to weight changes (JND). Across all viewpoints, participants on average slightly overestimated their body weight (3.1%) and could detect a weight difference of 5.2% in 50% of the trials. To further investigate whether females are also able to estimate own body size when the shape of the test bodies is clearly different to theirs, a set of personalized male avatars was generated for each participant and presented in front view using the same task. There was no difference in results between female and male test bodies. These results suggest that people are rather good at extracting body size independent of the viewpoint, and also from bodies with a very different shape.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2018

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×