September 2018
Volume 18, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2018
Search inefficiency in a directionally consistent target among directionally switching distractors
Author Affiliations
  • Hoko Nakada
    Department of Psychology, The University of Tokyo
  • Ikuya Murakami
    Department of Psychology, The University of Tokyo
Journal of Vision September 2018, Vol.18, 346. doi:10.1167/18.10.346
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Hoko Nakada, Ikuya Murakami; Search inefficiency in a directionally consistent target among directionally switching distractors. Journal of Vision 2018;18(10):346. doi: 10.1167/18.10.346.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Visual search is efficient when observers search for a moving target among static distractors and that search efficiency is equally high for a static target among moving distractors. However, visual motion often compromises search efficiency, as when all search items are moving, making search based on other features rather inefficient. Based on these effects of the presence of motion signals on visual search, we asked whether more complex motion signals such as directional reversal could affect search efficiency. To address this question, we used moving gabor patches as search items and reversed their motion directions over time during a visual search task. In one condition, the target was a gabor patch that periodically switched its motion direction whereas the remaining items, the distractors, maintained their motion directions. In another condition, the target maintained its motion direction whereas the distractors periodically switched their directions altogether. If the presence of visual motion per se disturbed search, both tasks should cause inefficient search. If, on the other hand, motion direction switching generally facilitated search, both tasks should cause efficient search. Furthermore, if the direction switching served as a salient feature, search asymmetry should emerge because a more salient item among less salient distractors would be easier to find than vice versa. Our results indeed demonstrated search asymmetry. Search was efficient for the directionally changing target among the consistently moving distractors, but was inefficient when the target consistently moved while the distractors changed their directions. This search asymmetry supported the hypothesis that motion direction switching is a salient feature in a visual search task for moving stimuli. Through a series of experiments, we clarified the determinant factor in motion direction switching that caused the search asymmetry, testing for possible factors such as orientation, acceleration, and synchrony.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2018

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×