September 2018
Volume 18, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2018
Color contrast gain in anomalous trichromats
Author Affiliations
  • John Vanston
    Department of Psychology, College of Liberal Arts, University of Nevada, Reno
  • Katherine Tregillus
    Department of Psychology, College of Liberal Arts, University of Nevada, Reno
  • Michael Webster
    Department of Psychology, College of Liberal Arts, University of Nevada, Reno
  • Michael Crognale
    Department of Psychology, College of Liberal Arts, University of Nevada, Reno
Journal of Vision September 2018, Vol.18, 360. doi:10.1167/18.10.360
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      John Vanston, Katherine Tregillus, Michael Webster, Michael Crognale; Color contrast gain in anomalous trichromats. Journal of Vision 2018;18(10):360. doi: 10.1167/18.10.360.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Anomalous trichromats have three cone types, but with diminished L vs M sensitivity due to shifted spectral sensitivities. We examined whether post-receptoral processing might amplify and thus compensate for these receptoral sensitivity losses. Compensation is predicted if – like color normals – the visual system of anomals adapts to match visual coding for their visual environment. Results from previous studies investigating this have been mixed, but recent evidence points to compensation in some tasks. The current study used threshold detection and two measures of suprathreshold perception (contrast matching and reaction times for discriminating color differences) to compare contrast coding in normal and anomalous observers. LM contrast thresholds were substantially higher in anomals. They also required more LM contrast to match a suprathreshold reference stimulus. However, the contrast losses were greater for thresholds than the suprathreshold matches. For each task, we modeled the cone-opponent signal expected from differences in the peak separation of the L and M cones. For anomals, the separation predicted by suprathreshold contrast matching was nearly twice that predicted by detection thresholds, suggesting neural compensation. Reaction times were measured at several contrast levels along the four cardinal directions of cone-opponent space. Anomals had slower average reaction times, consistent with a weaker contrast response, but had nearly identical reaction times at the highest contrast level, indicating a stronger contrast dependence. However, unlike the contrast matching, deficits were also observed for stimuli that varied in S cone contrast. This suggests that under the stimulus conditions used, the reaction times of anomalous trichromats cannot be accounted for by simple gain adjustments for their sensitivity losses.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2018

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×