September 2018
Volume 18, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2018
Depth constancy for virtual and physical objects
Author Affiliations
  • Brittney Hartle
    Department of Psychology, and Centre for Vision Research, York University
  • Matthew Cutone
    Department of Psychology, and Centre for Vision Research, York University
  • Laurie Wilcox
    Department of Psychology, and Centre for Vision Research, York University
Journal of Vision September 2018, Vol.18, 508. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Brittney Hartle, Matthew Cutone, Laurie Wilcox; Depth constancy for virtual and physical objects. Journal of Vision 2018;18(10):508.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

It is generally assumed that stereopsis plays an important role in 3D shape perception; if so, the disparity-defined shape signal must be consistent across a range of viewing distances. Studies of stereoscopic depth constancy have used a wide variety of stimuli and tasks, and come to similarly wide-ranging conclusions. The aim of this series of experiments is to understand how perceived depth magnitude is impacted by viewing distance, cue conflicts, and surface structure in virtual and physical objects. To this end, we measured perceived depth magnitude using virtual textured half-cylinders and identical 3D printed versions, presented at 83 and 130cm. Virtual stimuli were viewed using a mirror stereoscope and an Oculus Rift head-mounted display. The physical stimuli were viewed in a controlled environment under similar lighting conditions. In all cases, observers used a pressure-sensitive strip to indicate the maximum depth of the cylinder, with stereopsis and without (monocular). Depth estimates were similar in the two virtual viewing conditions, despite the optical distortions and lower resolution of the VR display. Performance was more accurate when viewing physical objects. In all three conditions there was incomplete scaling of depth with viewing distance, but this was less extreme in the physical test condition. To estimate the 'assumed' distance to the object, we used each observers' estimate, binocular geometry, and maximum likelihood estimation. Comparison of the ratio of the presented distances to those computed from the results, suggests that distance was underestimated by about 22% in both the VR and stereoscope conditions. We conclude that the failure of depth constancy in virtual stimuli is not modulated by the degree of vergence-accommodation conflict, and that depth constancy is not complete, even for physical stimuli.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2018


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.