September 2018
Volume 18, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2018
Task relevance affects the context-dependency of implicit learning
Author Affiliations
  • Injae Hong
    Department of Psychology, Yonsei UniversityDepartment of Structure & Function of Neural Network, Korea Brain Research Institute
  • Su Keun Jeong
    Department of Structure & Function of Neural Network, Korea Brain Research Institute
  • Min-Shik Kim
    Department of Psychology, Yonsei University
Journal of Vision September 2018, Vol.18, 643. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/18.10.643
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Injae Hong, Su Keun Jeong, Min-Shik Kim; Task relevance affects the context-dependency of implicit learning. Journal of Vision 2018;18(10):643. https://doi.org/10.1167/18.10.643.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Recent studies have revealed that a spatial bias emerges toward a location where a target appears with high probability. However, it is not clear whether the spatial bias can distinguishably emerge when different context contains different probabilistic information. In the current study, participants searched for a target among multiple distractors. The context (i.e., the color of stimuli) predicted which quadrant is more likely to contain a target. For example, a black target appeared more frequently in one quadrant of the search display, and a white target appeared more frequently in another quadrant. If probability learning is context-specific, a spatial bias to different quadrants would emerge depending on a given context. In contrast, an equal spatial bias to two quadrants would emerge regardless of contexts, if probability learning is context-independent. In Experiment 1, when a search display contained only one context (either black or white stimuli), attention was equally biased to both target-frequent quadrants regardless of the context, showing context-independent spatial bias. This result was not due to lack of time to process context information (Experiment 2). However, context information was not critical in Experiments 1 and 2, because each search display only contained a single context. In Experiment 3, a search display contained both black and white stimuli and participants were pre-cued which color context they should use. Results showed that a significant context-specific spatial bias emerged as context became task-relevant. Context-specific spatial bias could have been the result of increased task difficulty as the set size doubled. However, context-specific spatial bias was still not found when search became difficult by modulating target-distractor similarity, suggesting that task relevance, not task difficulty, influences context-specific spatial bias. These results demonstrate that statistical knowledge can be distinguishably learned for different contexts, when the contexts are relevant to the task.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2018

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×