September 2018
Volume 18, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2018
Cognitive models modulate action-perception coupling in perceptual multistability
Author Affiliations
  • Peter Veto
    Chemnitz University of Technology, Institute of Physics - Physics of Cognition Group, Chemnitz, Germany
  • Marvin Uhlig
    Chemnitz University of Technology, Institute of Physics - Physics of Cognition Group, Chemnitz, Germany
  • Nikolaus Troje
    Department of Psychology, Queen's University, ON, Canada
  • Wolfgang Einhäuser
    Chemnitz University of Technology, Institute of Physics - Physics of Cognition Group, Chemnitz, Germany
Journal of Vision September 2018, Vol.18, 669. doi:10.1167/18.10.669
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Peter Veto, Marvin Uhlig, Nikolaus Troje, Wolfgang Einhäuser; Cognitive models modulate action-perception coupling in perceptual multistability. Journal of Vision 2018;18(10):669. doi: 10.1167/18.10.669.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Theories like "common coding" suggest joint representations of action and perception, which implies a bidirectional coupling between these domains. Effects of perception on action are self-evident. Evidence for direct effects of action on perception arises from perceptual bistability: congruent movements stabilize the interpretation of an ambiguous stimulus. Can cognitive processes affect such action-to-perception transfer? Observers viewed a structure-from-motion cylinder of ambiguous motion direction. Prior to the ambiguous stimulus, we presented unambiguous versions that suggest a mechanical model on how the cylinder connects to a rod; in the "belt-drive" condition the rod rotated in the same direction as the cylinder, in the "gear-drive" condition in the opposing direction. Observers rotated a manipulandum either the same way as the rod (congruent instruction) or in the opposing way (incongruent instruction). In the "belt-drive" condition, the congruent instruction translates to congruency between perception and manual rotation. In the "gear-drive" condition, the congruent instruction translates to *in*congruency between perception and action. If the action-to-perception transfer is not influenced by the internal model of the underlying mechanics, we would find that congruent movement stabilizes the percept in both conditions. If, however, the effect depends upon cognitive assumptions, we would find a more stable percept with incongruent movement in the "gear-drive" condition. Results showed a significant interaction between the trained mechanical model and the action-to-perception transfer. While the congruency-effect was present in the "belt-drive" condition, no difference in either direction was found following the "gear-drive" training. This suggests that perceptual and cognitive congruency effects nullify each other. Hence, the observers' internal model of a machine's operation influences action-to-perception transfer.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2018

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×