September 2018
Volume 18, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2018
How does aging affect the human visual short-term memory task for object-location and name-location binding?
Author Affiliations
  • Raju Sapkota
    Vision and Eye Research Unit, School of Medicine, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK, CB1 1PT
  • Ian van der Linde
    Vision and Eye Research Unit, School of Medicine, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK, CB1 1PTDepartment of Computing and Technology, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK, CB1 1PT
  • Shahina Pardhan
    Vision and Eye Research Unit, School of Medicine, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK, CB1 1PT
Journal of Vision September 2018, Vol.18, 697. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/18.10.697
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Raju Sapkota, Ian van der Linde, Shahina Pardhan; How does aging affect the human visual short-term memory task for object-location and name-location binding?. Journal of Vision 2018;18(10):697. https://doi.org/10.1167/18.10.697.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

It is believed that age-related differences in human visual short-term memory (VSTM) performance reflect an impaired ability to retain bound object representations (viz., form, name, spatial, and temporal location). This study examined how healthy aging affects memory retrieval using a set of sequential form and/or location/name memory recognition tasks in which one component (form, location) was cued.Thirty-six young healthy adults (mean age 22.1 years, SD 2.6) and thirty-six normally aging older adults (mean age 69.2 years, SD 6.0), all with normal vision and hearing (self-reported), completed five tasks: 1. Object recognition for two or four sequentially displayed objects; 2. Spatial location recognition for two or four sequentially displayed objects; 3. Combined object-location recognition for two or four sequentially displayed objects; 4. Object recognition with location priming for two or four sequentially displayed objects; 5. Combined name-location recognition for four sequentially displayed objects. Significantly lower performance for older adults in location recognition [task 2, F(1,35) = 5.17, p = 0.03, 2 (Sequence lengths) × 2(Age groups) ANOVA], object-location binding [task 3, F(1,35) = 13.45, p = 0.001, 2 (Sequence lengths) × 2(Age groups) ANOVA], object recognition with location priming [task 4, F(1,35) = 5.53, p = 0.02, 2 (Sequence lengths) × 2(Age groups) ANOVA], and name-location binding [task 5, t(70) = 3.35, p = 0.001, Independent Samples t-Test] were found. The performance of normally aging adults was selectively and significantly lower than young adults in VSTM tasks that required object-location or name-location binding. Older adults exhibited greater impairment when object location (rather than form) was used as a cue during memory retrieval. The findings add to the 'memory source' model by suggesting that age-related decline in VSTM binding performance are driven by impairments in spatial location recognition and priming.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2018

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×