September 2018
Volume 18, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2018
Different ways of correcting for previous temporal errors in interception tasks.
Author Affiliations
  • Joan López-Moliner
    Institut de Neurosciences (UBneuro) Universitat de Barcelona
  • Cécile Vullings
    SCALab Université Lille 3
  • Laurent Madelain
    SCALab Université Lille 3
  • Robert van Beers
    Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Journal of Vision September 2018, Vol.18, 845. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Joan López-Moliner, Cécile Vullings, Laurent Madelain, Robert van Beers; Different ways of correcting for previous temporal errors in interception tasks.. Journal of Vision 2018;18(10):845.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Correction on the basis of previous errors is paramount to sensorimotor learning. While corrections of spatial errors have been studied extensively, little is known about corrections of previous temporal errors. We tackled this problem in different conditions involving hand movements (HM), saccadic eye movements (SM) or button presses (BP). The task was to intercept a moving target (3 possible velocities) at a designated zone (i.e. no spatial error) either with the hand sliding a pen on a graphics tablet (HM), a saccade (SM) or a button press (BP) that released a cursor moving ballistically for a fixed time of 330 ms. The dependency of the final temporal error on action onset varied from "low" in HM (due to possible online corrections) to "very high" in the BP condition. We analyzed the lag-1 autocorrelation (acf(1)) of action onset and the dependency on previous errors to study how trial-by-trial corrections were made. In conditions SM and BP, acf(1) was not different from zero denoting an optimal correction, while subjects under-corrected (acf(1) >0) in the HM condition. Interestingly, in conditions SM and BP action onset did not depend on the previous temporal error, but it did in the HM condition. However, this dependency was clearly modulated by the duration of movement time as faster movements depended less on the previous actual temporal error. One explanation for how subjects corrected in SM, BP and HM involving fast movements would be that they used the predictive error (i.e. intended action onset minus actual action onset). An analysis using a Kalman filter confirmed that our results are consistent with the time of action onset being driven by the predictive error. The type of temporal error that is used seems to depend on the possibility of exerting online control during the interceptive movement.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2018


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.