September 2018
Volume 18, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2018
Visual plasticity induced by short-term monocular deprivation recovers without visual input
Author Affiliations
  • Seung Hyun Min
    Department of Ophthalmology, McGill Vision Research, McGill University
  • Alex Baldwin
    Department of Ophthalmology, McGill Vision Research, McGill University
  • Robert Hess
    Department of Ophthalmology, McGill Vision Research, McGill University
Journal of Vision September 2018, Vol.18, 939. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/18.10.939
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Seung Hyun Min, Alex Baldwin, Robert Hess; Visual plasticity induced by short-term monocular deprivation recovers without visual input. Journal of Vision 2018;18(10):939. https://doi.org/10.1167/18.10.939.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Short-term monocular deprivation in adults has been shown to temporarily strengthen the contribution of the patched eye to a fused percept. In adults, the effect of monocular deprivation disappears within 30 minutes after the patch has been taken off (Zhou et al., doi: 10.1155/2017/4780876). Here we investigate whether visual deprivation (sitting in the dark) after patching would preserve the effect of monocular deprivation. We patched six adults with normal vision for two hours with a translucent eyepatch. We used a binocular phase combination task to measure each eye's contribution to a fused percept. For the control condition, subjects performed two rounds of baseline tests, were patched for two hours, then performed post-patching measurements at 0, 3, 6, 12, 24, 48, 60 and 96 minutes after patch removal. For the visual deprivation condition, the subjects sat in darkness after patching with both eyes covered for one hour. Subjects then performed the post-patching tests. Each subject completed two sessions for every condition. There was a significant difference (Wilcoxon Signed-Rank, P< 0.05, Cohen's d = 1.5) in the effect of monocular deprivation between the darkness and control conditions. Subjects recovered from monocular deprivation even when sitting in the dark. This result suggests that recovery from the patching effect does not require visual input.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2018

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×