September 2018
Volume 18, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2018
Conservative Criterion Explains The Non-Conscious Perception of Facial Expression Under Continuous Flash Suppression
Author Affiliations
  • Ali Pournaghdali
    Department of Psychology, Florida International University
  • Bennett Schwartz
    Department of Psychology, Florida International University
Journal of Vision September 2018, Vol.18, 945. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/18.10.945
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Ali Pournaghdali, Bennett Schwartz; Conservative Criterion Explains The Non-Conscious Perception of Facial Expression Under Continuous Flash Suppression. Journal of Vision 2018;18(10):945. https://doi.org/10.1167/18.10.945.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

A main question in the scientific study of conscious perception is the nature of the dissociation between conscious and non-conscious perception. That is, it is crucial to use bias-free measures to evaluate perceptual sensitivity and response criterion of participants in the conscious and non-conscious tasks to evaluate this dissociation. The aim of this study is to evaluate sensitivity and criterion of participants, using signal detection methods, in a conscious detection and a non-conscious 2-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) tasks for facial expression perception while employing continuous flash suppression (CFS). We hypothesized that non-conscious perception of facial expression under CFS demonstrates real differences between conscious and non-conscious perception. We predicted that participants' sensitivity in the detection task will be significantly lower than their sensitivity in the 2AFC task. After rendering invisible images of faces with different facial expression (fearful vs. neutral) for five hundred milliseconds using CFS, participants judged the presence/absence of the faces with a yes/no detection task and the emotion of faces with the 2AFC task. After acquiring data, we evaluated participants' ability to discriminate signal from noise using d' (an index of sensitivity in signal detection theory) and their criterion for detection and 2AFC task. Our results indicate that there is no significant difference between sensitivity of participants in detection and 2AFC task, but we found higher criterion value for detection compared to 2AFC task. Our results indicate that participants' ability to discriminate signal from noise is diminished for both detection and 2AFC tasks while using CFS. Therefore, non-conscious perception of facial expression with CFS may be the result of a more conservative criterion in the detection task as compared to 2AFC task rather than from dissociable processes. These results provided additional evidence for the importance of using bias-free measures over the accuracy-based methods in visual consciousness research.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2018

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×