September 2018
Volume 18, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2018
Continuous theta burst TMS of area MT impairs attentive motion tracking
Author Affiliations
  • Tiffany Tran
    School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Waterloo
  • Arijit Chakraborty
    School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Waterloo
  • Deborah Giaschi
    Department of Ophthamology, University of British Columbia
  • Benjamin Thompson
    School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Waterloo
Journal of Vision September 2018, Vol.18, 985. doi:10.1167/18.10.985
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Tiffany Tran, Arijit Chakraborty, Deborah Giaschi, Benjamin Thompson; Continuous theta burst TMS of area MT impairs attentive motion tracking. Journal of Vision 2018;18(10):985. doi: 10.1167/18.10.985.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Multiple object tracking (MOT) is impaired in amblyopia. This deficit has been associated with reduced MT activity during MOT task performance, suggesting that MT plays an important role in attentive tracking. To test this possibility, we assessed whether modulation of MT activity using inhibitory continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) would influence MOT performance in participants with normal vision. The MOT stimulus consisted of 4 targets and 4 distractors and was presented at 10° eccentricity (right and left hemifields). Functional MRI-guided cTBS was applied to left MT at 100% of active motor threshold intensity. Participants (n=15, age: 27±3) attended separate active and sham cTBS sessions. During cTBS, the MOT task was presented at each participant's speed threshold. Percent correct (based on partial report) for 40 trials was measured at baseline (before cTBS) and 5min and 30min after cTBS stimulation. Baseline accuracy did not vary between the right and left hemifields. There was a significant interaction between cTBS type (active/sham) and measurement time (baseline/post cTBS 5min or 30min) (F2,18=5.71, p=0.01). For active cTBS, there was a significant reduction in accuracy from baseline for the right hemifield after 5min (10 ± 2% reduction; t14 = 1.95, p = 0.03) and after 30min (15±3% reduction; t14=2.96, p=0.01). The left hemifield exhibited improved accuracy 30min after active cTBS (6±1.5% improvement, t14=-2.24, p=0.02). For sham cTBS, accuracy improved in both hemifields equally (right: 9 ± 2% improvement; t14=-2.94, p=0.02 and left: 9±1.5% improvement; t14=1.95, p=0.04). Our results demonstrate that cTBS of MT impaired MOT accuracy. There were improvements in MOT accuracy in the control hemifield and in the sham condition suggesting a task learning effect. These results highlight the importance of lower-level motion processing for MOT and support previous findings indicating that impaired MT function is responsible for MOT deficits in patients with amblyopia.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2018

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×