September 2018
Volume 18, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2018
Visual hemifields are a bottleneck for awareness
Author Affiliations
  • Evan Reierson
    University of Denver Department of PsychologyUniversity of Denver School of Engineering and Computer Science
  • Timothy Sweeny
    University of Denver Department of Psychology
Journal of Vision September 2018, Vol.18, 1171. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Evan Reierson, Timothy Sweeny; Visual hemifields are a bottleneck for awareness. Journal of Vision 2018;18(10):1171.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Visual processing is constrained by bottlenecks of space and attention. Interestingly, both of these bottlenecks can occur at a large scale—the visual hemifield. For example, object-selective neurons have large receptive fields, often encompassing the entire left- or right-visual field, and attention within each hemifield is supported by independent resources. Notable accounts of object representation (e.g., OSM) propose that iterative processing is engaged to overcome these bottlenecks, continuing until ambiguity about an object's identity and location is resolved. According to this framework, visual awareness of an object should also depend on the completion of this process, and should be gated by processing constraints within the left- and right-visual hemifields. Here, we tested and confirmed this hypothesis. We presented quartets of objects scattered among a variety of peripheral locations. Quartets appeared for 20-msec, with spatial arrangements either within a hemifield or spread across the left- and right-hemifields. Objects included gabors, inverted mooney-faces, and upright mooney-faces, each with a leftward- or rightward-tilt. We used OSM to mask (and cue) one of the peripheral locations, which may or may not have contained an object. On each trial, observers indicated (1) whether an object was present at the masked location, and (2) whether it was tilted to the left or right. Not surprisingly, orientation discrimination was worse when objects were presented within a hemifield compared to across hemifields. More important, within-hemifield arrangements profoundly disrupted detection of an object's presence. These effects occurred for each object type, presumably reflecting the operation of a processing bottleneck that applies to multiple levels of stimulus complexity and/or stages of visual analysis. Our findings cannot be accounted for by differences in crowding or visual acuity. Rather, we have demonstrated a more general phenomenon in which the hemifield-based architecture of visual processing gates access to visual awareness.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2018


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.