September 2018
Volume 18, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2018
Detecting motion-changes with peripheral vision: On the superiority of fixating over tracking.
Author Affiliations
  • Christian Vater
    University of Bern, Institute of Sport Science
  • Andre Klostermann
    University of Bern, Institute of Sport Science
  • Ernst-Joachim Hossner
    University of Bern, Institute of Sport Science
Journal of Vision September 2018, Vol.18, 1277. doi:10.1167/18.10.1277
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Christian Vater, Andre Klostermann, Ernst-Joachim Hossner; Detecting motion-changes with peripheral vision: On the superiority of fixating over tracking.. Journal of Vision 2018;18(10):1277. doi: 10.1167/18.10.1277.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Peripheral-motion-change-detection performance was examined by contrasting a fixation with a SPEM condition. To that end, participants were confronted with a visual display consisting of 15 white squares and 1 red square circulating with 6°/s (tracking condition) and stopping in-between (fixation condition). The instruction was to visually follow the red square and to press a button as soon as a white square begins to move. The to-be-detected white square movements varied in eccentricity and speed. A Vicon-integrated eye-tracking system was used for controlling gaze behaviour. Response times (ms) and missed detections (%) were measured as dependent variables. Results in Experiment 1 show faster motion-change detection in fixation vs. tracking condition (401 ms vs. 809 ms) and increased response times as a function of eccentricity in the tracking condition only (4°: 570 ms; 8°: 737 ms; 16°: 1121 ms). Moreover, missed detections were revealed at 16° eccentricity in the tracking condition only. Experiment 2 controlled for foveal load as possible confounder by replacing the red square with a virtual centre evoked by 4 red squares. The same results were obtained as in Experiment 1. In Experiment 3 we tested motion-detections with fixations and SPEM at 9 eccentricities (4-20°). We observed constant response times for fixations over the eccentricities (around 550ms), but during SPEM, response times increased from 4° (701 ms) to 14° (895 ms) to 20° (1433 ms). Missed detections were again only observed at eccentricities of 16° and higher. In sum, it could be shown that SPEM impair the ability to detect peripheral motion changes.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2018


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.