July 2019
Volume 19, Issue 8
Open Access
OSA Fall Vision Meeting Abstract  |   July 2019
The Motion Induced Contour Revisited: Rotations in depth reveal novel illusory contours
Author Affiliations
  • Gideon Caplovitz
    Psychology, University of Nevada Reno
  • Gennady Erlikhman
    Psychology, University of Nevada Reno
Journal of Vision July 2019, Vol.19, 75. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/19.8.75
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Gideon Caplovitz, Gennady Erlikhman; The Motion Induced Contour Revisited: Rotations in depth reveal novel illusory contours. Journal of Vision 2019;19(8):75. https://doi.org/10.1167/19.8.75.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Victor Klymenko and Naomi Weisstein first described the Motion-Induced Contour (MIC) in 1980. In their original demo, a tilted wire cube is shown with one of its vertical edges removed. When the cube is set in motion, rotating in depth back and forth about its vertical axis, an illusory contour is perceived in the position of that missing edge. These displays are interesting because the illusory contours can be nearly orthogonal to the inducing, real edges, unlike most illusory contour displays. Through a series of papers, Klymenko and Weisstein concluded that the perception of the contour depends on a 3-D surface interpretation: structure-from-motion, a rigidity constraint, and is not simply due to rotation or motion in depth but rather 3D rotation through depth. Inspired by their work, we have for the first time in nearly 40 years recreated their original stimuli and have created several novel variants of their original illusion that challenge the initial conclusions. We show (1) MICs are minimally affected by scene context. This allows illusory contours to be observed in ‘empty-space’ between structure-from-motion induced surfaces. (2) Only the motion of the real contours need be rigid – non-rigid MICs can be formed. (3) Some MIC displays are bi-stable: perceived global motion changes as a function of perceived depth arrangement of the real edges, and this in turn can determine the formation of MIC’s, and (4) minimal displays with only two or four edges also produce illusory surfaces, which are sometimes attached to only a single real contour.


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.