July 2019
Volume 19, Issue 8
Open Access
OSA Fall Vision Meeting Abstract  |   July 2019
Reading in mild to moderate traumatic brain injury (mTBI)
Author Affiliations
  • Saeideh Ghahghaei
    The Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute
  • Meron Haile
    California Pacific Medical Center
  • Arvind Chandna
    The Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute
  • Marilyn Schneck
    The Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute
Journal of Vision July 2019, Vol.19, 98. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/19.8.98
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Saeideh Ghahghaei, Meron Haile, Arvind Chandna, Marilyn Schneck; Reading in mild to moderate traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Journal of Vision 2019;19(8):98. https://doi.org/10.1167/19.8.98.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

TBI affects working-age population. People with mTBI often complain about having problems with reading, yet must spend extended time reading each day to accomplish work and personal goals. The few studies that have examined reading in mTBI employed short text; we hypothesized that sustained (≥20 minutes) reading would induce fatigue, affecting oculomotor performance, including accommodation.

Methods: Native English speaker adults (4 with mTBIs and 4 controls) were recruited. All had normal acuity and no ocular pathology. Participants completed a questionnaire regarding their reading habits and the Convergence Insufficiency Symptom (CIS) survey.

For the reading studies, participants read a text from IReST while their accommodation was measured using a PlusOptix PowerRefractor 3. This was done before and after sustained reading for comprehension.

All mTBIs reported reading several hours a day. TBIs scored much higher (reported more problems) in the CIS. IReST and sustained reading time were correlated. Reading got slower post versus pre sustained reading for IReST. TBIs showed a larger change in accommodation which was correlated with their CIS score. The change in accommodation was related to change in reading time: those who accommodated less read more slowly during the post IReST.

Our results suggest that inefficiency in both accommodation and convergence contribute to reading problem in TBIs.


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.