September 2019
Volume 19, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2019
Congenital Prosopagnosics Show Reduced Configural Effects in an Odd-Man-Out Detection Task
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Rafael S Maarek
    Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California
  • Emily X Meschke
    Program in Neuroscience, University of Southern California
  • Irving Biederman
    Department of Psychology, University of Southern California
    Program in Neuroscience, University of Southern California
Journal of Vision September 2019, Vol.19, 22c. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Rafael S Maarek, Emily X Meschke, Irving Biederman; Congenital Prosopagnosics Show Reduced Configural Effects in an Odd-Man-Out Detection Task. Journal of Vision 2019;19(10):22c.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

One potential explanation for the deficit in holistic processing exhibited by congenital prosopagnosics (CPs) is that CPs have smaller receptive fields (r.f.s) in face selective regions (Witthoft et al., 2016). Large, overlapping receptive fields allow small differences in similar faces to affect the activation of cells whose r.f.s are distributed throughout the face. Xu et al. (2014) demonstrated that the face configural effect, described as the benefit in accuracy in identifying a studied individual’s eyes, nose, or mouth in the context of the individual’s face as compared to when presented in isolation, could be attributed to large r.f.s. While effective in measuring the configural effect in control subjects, their memory-based paradigm was ill-suited to measure the configural effect in individuals who struggle with learning faces. The present study used an odd-man-out paradigm in which 216 subjects had to detect which one of a diagonal array of three faces was different. Each image included a pair of eyes, a nose, and a mouth, either arranged from top to bottom or in the reverse order and either viewed in the context of a head or in isolation (Fig. 1). Subjects who failed to demonstrate normal proficiency on standard tests of face recognition (USCFPT, CFMT, PI20) (Fig. 2) showed significantly reduced benefits on their detection RTs from the presence of a head and the natural ordering of the face parts (Fig. 2) indicating their failure to benefit from a configural representation

Acknowledgement: Harold W. Dornsife Research Fund 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.