September 2019
Volume 19, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2019
Trial-by-trial feedback does not improve performance or metacognition in a large-sample perceptual task
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Nadia Haddara
    School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology
  • Dobromir Rahnev
    School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology
Journal of Vision September 2019, Vol.19, 27. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Nadia Haddara, Dobromir Rahnev; Trial-by-trial feedback does not improve performance or metacognition in a large-sample perceptual task. Journal of Vision 2019;19(10):27.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

While some studies report that trial-by-trial feedback improves performance on perceptual tasks, others have suggested that it has little to no effect. In the present study, we examined the effect of trial-by-trial feedback on both the perceptual decision and confidence in the accuracy of that decision (metacognition) in a large sample of participants (n = 450). Participants were randomly assigned to a trial-by-trial feedback group or no-feedback group and completed two perceptual tasks. In Task 1, participants were required to make a perceptual judgment concerning whether the letter X or O occurred more frequently in a 7 × 7 grid, and the assigned group received feedback on the accuracy of each response. Task 2 included a similar 7 × 7 grid with a red/blue discrimination. Both groups were given no feedback on Task 2 in order to determine whether any putative improvements would generalize to a new task. All perceptual decisions were followed by a 4-point confidence rating. Although a steady improvement in performance over time was observed in both tasks, results demonstrated that trial-by-trial feedback had no effect on either task performance or confidence ratings. Specifically, in Task 1, participants in the feedback and no-feedback groups had similar perceptual sensitivity (d’feedback= 1.86, d’no-feedback = 1.86; p= .97) and metacognitive ability (Mratiofeedback = 0.70, Mrationo-feedback = 0.76; p= .11). The lack of difference between the feedback and no-feedback groups extended to Task 2 as well (d’feedback = 1.76, d’no-feedback = 1.70; p= .28, Mratiofeedback = 0.71, Mrationo-feedback = 0.77; p= .16). Considering that the sample used was much larger than previous reports, these data indicate the possibility that trial-by-trial feedback may not meaningfully impact either perceptual performance or metacognition.


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.