September 2019
Volume 19, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2019
Consolidating Multiple Items Into Visual Working Memory is a Parallel and Remarkably Fast Process
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Michael S Pratte
    Mississippi State University, Department of Psychology
  • Marshall L Green
    Mississippi State University, Department of Psychology
Journal of Vision September 2019, Vol.19, 40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/19.10.40
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Michael S Pratte, Marshall L Green; Consolidating Multiple Items Into Visual Working Memory is a Parallel and Remarkably Fast Process. Journal of Vision 2019;19(10):40. doi: https://doi.org/10.1167/19.10.40.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Understanding how we consolidate visual information into working memory is critical for our understanding of any subsequent mechanism, such as memory storage or retrieval. However, here we suggest that the current, prominent understanding of how items are consolidated is incorrect. In particular, we find evidence against the influential claim that increasing the number of to-be-consolidated items slows the consolidation process. The time course of consolidation was examined in a novel paradigm in which an array of colored stimuli was presented for a variable amount of time. At the end of this stimulus period one item was immediately replaced with a mask, which also served as a cue, drawing attention to that item in the same moment it was masked. Participants then reported the color of the cued/masked item, and using a mixture model analysis we found that only a few items were available in memory after the cue/mask. This limited capacity existed even though there was effectively no memory retention interval, and even when the stimuli were presented for an entire second. Critically, however, shortening the stimulus period from 1000 ms to as little as 100 ms had almost no effect on performance. Moreover, although further shortening the stimulus duration below 100 ms did hurt performance, these effects did not interact with set size, implicating visual masking rather than an interruption of the consolidation process. We suggest that the previous demonstration of such an interaction did not in fact reflect encoding processes. Instead, we show that this result reflects a surprising effect whereby memory for masked items in a multi-item display continues to decay after the mask. These results suggest that visual encoding is capacity limited, but extremely fast and operates in parallel across items.

Acknowledgement: NIH NIMH Grant R15MH113075 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×