September 2019
Volume 19, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2019
Neural markers of visual working memory encoding and maintenance track attentional prioritization
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Christine Salahub
    Psychology Department, Brock University
  • Holly A Lockhart
    Psychology Department, Brock University
  • Blaire Dube
    Psychology Department, University of Guelph
  • Naseem Al-Aidroos
    Psychology Department, University of Guelph
  • Stephen M Emrich
    Psychology Department, Brock University
Journal of Vision September 2019, Vol.19, 90b. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Christine Salahub, Holly A Lockhart, Blaire Dube, Naseem Al-Aidroos, Stephen M Emrich; Neural markers of visual working memory encoding and maintenance track attentional prioritization. Journal of Vision 2019;19(10):90b. doi:

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

There is a limit to how much information can be stored in visual working memory (VWM). Previous models of this limitation have focused on the effects of VWM load, finding that behavioral recall of memory items becomes worse as load increases. Similarly, ERP studies examining the neural markers of VWM have focused primarily on load effects, exploring a component that tracks memory load: the contralateral delay activity (CDA). However, there is evidence that load is not the only limiting factor of performance, as behavior is better predicted by attentional resource allocation across items than by load alone. Given that attention can be flexibly distributed across items, we tested whether the CDA reflects the allocation of attention in addition to memory load. In Experiment 1, we examined the CDA during low (one) and high (four) memory loads; critically, in one condition we also manipulated the allocation of attentional resources by presenting a cue indicating that one of four items would be probed on 50% of trials. When one item was prioritized, the CDA was intermediate between the low and high load conditions, suggesting that the CDA was modulated by resource allocation rather than load alone. In Experiment 2, we examined a wider range of cueing probabilities (i.e. 100%, 75%, 25%, or 0% probe likelihood) while holding load constant. Stimuli were also presented along the vertical and horizontal midline to examine ERP components reflecting attentional enhancement (N2pc) and suppression (PD) during encoding. The results revealed that the amplitudes of the N2pc and CDA (but not the PD) increased proportionally with priority, and that these amplitudes predicted individuals’ behavioral precision. Our findings suggest that ERP markers of VWM encoding and maintenance reflect attentional prioritization in addition to load.

Acknowledgement: Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Doctoral Post-Graduate Scholarship, NSERC Discovery Grant [#435945], and the NSERC Research Tools and Instruments Grant [#458707] 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.