September 2019
Volume 19, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2019
Attending to individual size modulates mean size computation
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Yong Min Choi
    Graduate Program in Cognitive Science, Yonsei University
  • Sang Chul Chong
    Graduate Program in Cognitive Science, Yonsei University
    Department of Psychology, Yonsei University
Journal of Vision September 2019, Vol.19, 99b. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Yong Min Choi, Sang Chul Chong; Attending to individual size modulates mean size computation. Journal of Vision 2019;19(10):99b. doi:

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Forming summary representations is important to process complex information. Indeed, numerous studies have shown evidence for efficient computations of statistical summaries such as mean size. Yet few studies have examined how the individual size contributes to the mean size computation. Here, we investigated how attended individual size influenced mean size estimation process. Specifically, we tested if varying individual size attended by either a pre- or post-cue could modulate mean size computation. In each trial, the test set comprising 8 gratings with different sizes and orientations was presented. Participants were asked to report both an individual orientation designated by a cue as well as the mean size of the gratings. One of the gratings with four size levels (size condition) were cued by an arrow either before (pre-cue condition) or after (post-cue condition) the test set. The orientation task performance was statistically above chance with no significant difference between size conditions. This result indicates that attention was successfully allocated to the cued grating. To test how the attended size contributed to the mean size computation, we analyzed the mean size bias by calculating the percentage difference between the reported and actual mean sizes. We found that the estimated mean size got larger as the size of the cued grating increased. However, the systematic trend was different between the cueing conditions. In the pre-cue condition, there was a significant linear trend depending on the attended size whereas the post-cue condition showed a significantly large estimation solely in the largest size condition. The overall results showed that mean size estimation changes systematically as a function of the attended individual size in summary representation. These post- and pre- attentional effects in the present study suggest that mean size is computed based on the representation of individual sizes themselves.

Acknowledgement: This research was supported by the Brain Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (NRF-2017M3C7A1029658). 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.