September 2019
Volume 19, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2019
Cueing Effects in the Attentional Network Test: a Spotlight Diffusion Model Analysis
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Ryan A Curl
    Syracuse University
  • Corey N White
    Missouri Western State University
Journal of Vision September 2019, Vol.19, 107c. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/19.10.107c
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Ryan A Curl, Corey N White; Cueing Effects in the Attentional Network Test: a Spotlight Diffusion Model Analysis. Journal of Vision 2019;19(10):107c. https://doi.org/10.1167/19.10.107c.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

The attentional network test (ANT) uses flanker stimuli with different cue conditions to quantify differences in attentional processing. However, it is unclear precisely how the alerting and orienting cues in the task affect different decision processes. The present study leveraged computational modeling to identify the relationship between attentional cues and decision components. ANT data from a large sample of 156 participants were analyzed using the spotlight diffusion model, which quantifies decision components for response caution, motor/encoding time, perceptual processing, and attentional control. The spotlight analysis showed that the attentional cues had multiple effects on decision processing. Compared to the no cue condition, an alerting cue led to faster encoding/motor speed, improved perceptual processing, and increased attentional focusing. The orienting cue further led to a decrease in response caution and increased encoding/motor speed and attentional focusing to reduce interference from incompatible flankers. Improvements in RTs can stem from multiple factors, so it is important to have a method to delineate these factors and determine which ones are driving differences in behavior. This analysis demonstrates that alerting and orienting cues have complex effects on decision processes that are not captured by simple differences in RTs, and that model-based analyses can delineate such effects to allow researchers to identify precisely how attentional processing varies across individuals or conditions in tasks like the ANT. Future work investigating differences in cognitive processing can benefit from the incorporation of model-based analyses to provide greater insight into the underlying factors that drive task performance.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×