September 2019
Volume 19, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2019
Object Semantic Knowledge Can Bias Visual Processing Toward the Dorsal and Ventral Stream
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Dick Dubbelde
    George Washington University
  • Sarah Shomstein
    George Washington University
Journal of Vision September 2019, Vol.19, 114d. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/19.10.114d
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Dick Dubbelde, Sarah Shomstein; Object Semantic Knowledge Can Bias Visual Processing Toward the Dorsal and Ventral Stream. Journal of Vision 2019;19(10):114d. https://doi.org/10.1167/19.10.114d.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Mounting evidence suggests that object semantic knowledge influences our perception. However, the mechanism of semantic influences on perception remains unclear. It has been shown that physical context biases perception of objects. For example, object processing can be biased to the dorsal (action related) or ventral (identification related) visual processing streams by manipulating hand location in relation to the object. If one’s hands are proximal to the object, processing is biased toward the dorsal stream and if the hands are distal from the object, processing is biased toward the ventral stream. We investigated whether this perceptual bias becomes associated with object identity such that tools (e.g., hammer, wrench, saw), frequently perceived near the hands, bias the dorsal stream and non-tools (e.g., house, window, hydrant), infrequently seen near the hands, bias the ventral stream, regardless of the physical context. We used a detection task in which objects (controlled for low-level features such as clutter and luminance), were briefly presented near fixation. Participants performed one of two tasks, each designed to exploit sensitivity of the two streams: (i) detecting object flickering, because the dorsal stream has higher temporal resolution, and (ii) detecting a small gap in the object outline, because the ventral stream has higher spatial resolution. A significant interaction between object group and target type was observed, such that non-tools had lower RTs and higher accuracies for the spatial gap than the tools and this difference collapsed in the flickering condition. Importantly, inverting the objects, thereby reducing their semantic content, removes this interaction. This suggests that the differential processing in the two streams is driven by semantic knowledge of objects, rather than low-level differences. These results support the hypothesis that object semantic knowledge, derived from experiential hand proximity, biases visual processing to the dorsal or ventral stream.

Acknowledgement: NSF BCS-1534823 to S.S. 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×