September 2019
Volume 19, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2019
Interference between summary representations of average and range in ensemble perception
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Dilakshan Srikanthan
    Department of Psychology, University of Toronto Scarborough
  • Marco A Sama
    Department of Psychology, University of Toronto Scarborough
  • Adrian Nestor
    Department of Psychology, University of Toronto Scarborough
  • Jonathan S Cant
    Department of Psychology, University of Toronto Scarborough
Journal of Vision September 2019, Vol.19, 195a. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/19.10.195a
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Dilakshan Srikanthan, Marco A Sama, Adrian Nestor, Jonathan S Cant; Interference between summary representations of average and range in ensemble perception. Journal of Vision 2019;19(10):195a. https://doi.org/10.1167/19.10.195a.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Ensemble perception refers to the visual system’s ability to compress redundant information from multiple objects (e.g., multiple sizes, orientations) into a single summary representation (e.g., average size, orientation). These summary representations are often formed more accurately than any single-item representation, which tend to be biased towards the average of the set. Interestingly, we have recently demonstrated that single-item perception is also biased towards the range of the set (Srikanthan et al., VSS 2018). Here we investigate this sensitivity to ensemble range further, by asking whether implicit processing of set range can interfere with representations of average orientation. Participants were shown 8 triangles of varying orientations and were instructed to remember the location and orientation of each triangle. In a 2AFC task, a target and distractor were presented and participants either reported the average orientation (global condition), or the orientation of a single triangle (local condition). In order to investigate whether set range can interfere with average orientation, the distractor in the global condition could either be an item within the range but not in the set, or an item outside the range. Similarly, in the local condition the distractor could either be an item within the range but not in the set, or the average orientation. Reports of single-item orientation in the local condition were significantly below chance for both distractor types, again demonstrating that representations of ensemble average and range bias single-object perception. Critically, reports of average orientation in the global condition were significantly less accurate when the distractor was an item within the range (but not in the set), compared with an item outside the range. Together, these results demonstrate implicit sensitivity to the range of ensemble items, and further our understanding of ensemble processing by revealing the presence of interference in the formation of different summary representations.

Acknowledgement: NSERC Discovery Grant to JSC 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×