September 2019
Volume 19, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2019
Depth from Motion Alters Radial & Rotational Motion-Defined Temporal Order Judgments
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Nestor Matthews
    Department of Psychology, Denison University
  • Leslie Welch
    Cognitive, Linguistic & Psychological Sciences, Brown University
  • Elena Festa
    Cognitive, Linguistic & Psychological Sciences, Brown University
  • Anthony Bruno
    Department of Psychology, Denison University
Journal of Vision September 2019, Vol.19, 207a. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/19.10.207a
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Nestor Matthews, Leslie Welch, Elena Festa, Anthony Bruno; Depth from Motion Alters Radial & Rotational Motion-Defined Temporal Order Judgments. Journal of Vision 2019;19(10):207a. doi: https://doi.org/10.1167/19.10.207a.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Introduction: This study addressed a recently discovered dissociation between temporal order judgments (TOJs) of radial and rotational motion stimuli (Matthews, Welch & Festa, 2018). Specifically, radial TOJ thresholds exhibited 3-fold differences depending on whether stimuli initially radiated in the same versus opposite directions. By contrast, rotational TOJ thresholds exhibited no dependence on same versus opposite initial rotational directions. To understand this non-intuitive dissociation, we psychophysically tested diverging predictions from two hypotheses. (1) The Attentional Prior Entry (APE) hypothesis posits faster neural relays for radially looming stimuli than for radially receding stimuli because looming objects are potentially more threatening (Franconeri & Simons, 2003). APE predicts TOJ psychometric-function biases (PSE shifts) and reaction time advantages skewed toward initially looming stimuli. (2) The Depth Uncertainty (DU) hypothesis posits that our previous data showing poor performance for the opposite-radial condition was due to trial-by-trial uncertainty about the number of depth planes to monitor. Rotational and same-radial conditions depicted two plaids at the same depth while opposite-radial condition depicted two plaids moving apart in depth. DU predicts a reduction in opposite-radial TOJ thresholds after reducing depth-from-motion uncertainty by constraining all trials within a block to the opposite-radial condition. Method: We bilaterally presented plaids that either radiated or rotated before changing direction. College students reported whether the direction changed first on the left or right. In Exp 1 (n=26), one stimulus initially loomed while the other initially receded. In Exp 2 (n=22), one stimulus initially loomed then receded, the other stimulus rotated. In Exp 3 (n=28), one stimulus initially receded then loomed, the other stimulus rotated. Results & Conclusion. In total, across the three experiments 76 participants completed 21,280 TOJ trials for analysis. The data disconfirmed the APE predictions while supporting the DU predictions. Depth from motion can generate dissociations between radially and rotationally defined TOJs.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×