September 2019
Volume 19, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2019
Neural reconstructions of attended object features using fMRI and EEG
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Jiageng Chen
    Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University
  • Emma W Dowd
    Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University
    Division of Enrollment Management, The University of Texas at Austin
  • Maurryce D Starks
    Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University
  • Julie D Golomb
    Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University
Journal of Vision September 2019, Vol.19, 269c. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jiageng Chen, Emma W Dowd, Maurryce D Starks, Julie D Golomb; Neural reconstructions of attended object features using fMRI and EEG. Journal of Vision 2019;19(10):269c.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Spatial attention is thought to play an essential role in selecting relevant information and ignoring irrelevant information. But spatial attention is dynamic, constantly shifting and splitting across multiple objects and locations. How can we measure neural representations of visual features under conditions of dynamic attention, and how do these measurements link with behavior? Both fMRI (e.g., Brouwer & Heeger, 2009) and EEG (e.g., Garcia, Srinivasan & Serences, 2013) have recently been used to reconstruct object features. Here we ask whether these reconstruction techniques can be applied to behaviorally-relevant, attended features (from a multi-item display), and whether the quality of these reconstructions are linked to behavior. In an fMRI task, subjects were briefly shown an array of three colored and oriented gratings. Subjects were then asked to report either the color or orientation of the grating at a spatially pre-cued location. To manipulate dynamic attention, some trials included a second spatial pre-cue at a different location, such that subjects had to covertly shift attention and report the features of the object at the new location. In a similar EEG task, two gratings were shown on the screen, and subjects were asked to covertly attend to one of them to detect subtle orientation changes. Using both techniques, we were able to reconstruct the features of the attended item by applying an inverted encoding model (e.g., Sprague & Serences, 2015). In particular, we achieved reliable feature reconstructions only when the feature was relevant to the current task. Moreover, fMRI neutral reconstruction performance was linked to trial-by-trial behavioral errors. These results emphasize the role of focused spatial attention in the feature-binding process and illustrate the potential of these techniques to provide neural measurements of attended feature representations under dynamic conditions without requiring behavioral responses.

Acknowledgement: NIH R01-EY025648(JG), Alfred P. Sloan(JG) 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.