September 2019
Volume 19, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2019
Surround Suppression in Attention to Spatial Frequency
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Ming W.H. Fang
    Department of psychology, Michigan State University
  • Taosheng Liu
    Department of psychology, Michigan State University
    Neuroscience program, Michigan State University
Journal of Vision September 2019, Vol.19, 270c. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Ming W.H. Fang, Taosheng Liu; Surround Suppression in Attention to Spatial Frequency. Journal of Vision 2019;19(10):270c.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Goal. While feature-based attention (FBA) enhances perception to an attended spatial frequency (SF), the precise profile of such attentional modulation remains unclear. The feature-similarity gain model predicts a monotonic modulation profile. However, the surround suppression model suggests a non-monotonic (Mexican hat) profile. Here, we investigated how the attentional modulation systematically varies as a function of the difference between the stimulus SF and the attended SF. Methods. We employed filtered Gaussian noise stimuli as target and unfiltered noise as mask in a two-interval forced choice paradigm. One interval contained the target of a particular SF and the other interval contained a scrambled version of the target as noise (masks were presented in both intervals to reduce visibility). Participants reported the interval that contained the target in two conditions. In a cueing condition, a fixed SF precue was presented before the stimuli, indicating the target SF in 50% of trials (valid). In the remaining trials (invalid), the target could be ±0.5, ±1, ±1.5, ±2 octaves away from the cued SF. In the neutral condition, no precue was presented which served as the baseline to assess the attentional modulation. Results. There was an enhancement for valid condition relative to the neutral condition. Importantly, for the invalid conditions, we found a suppression at +1 octave followed by a rebound at +1.5 octaves. However, the lower frequencies (i.e., −2 to 0 octaves) showed a monotonic profile. Thus, FBA elicited a surround suppression modulation for higher SF and a feature-similarity modulation for lower SF. This asymmetry in attentional modulation might be related to a wider neuronal tuning bandwidth toward higher frequencies on a linear scale. We performed model simulations to explore the potential interactions between neuronal tuning and FBA’s modulation profile.


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.