September 2019
Volume 19, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2019
Unimodal and Cross-Modal Shape Recognition
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Ashley E Peterson
    Department of Psychological Sciences, Ogden College of Science and Engineering, Western Kentucky University
  • Farley Norman
    Department of Psychological Sciences, Ogden College of Science and Engineering, Western Kentucky University
  • Hannah K Shapiro
    Carol Martin Gatton Academy of Mathematics and Science
  • Matthew D Hall
    Department of Psychological Sciences, Ogden College of Science and Engineering, Western Kentucky University
Journal of Vision September 2019, Vol.19, 300c. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/19.10.300c
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Ashley E Peterson, Farley Norman, Hannah K Shapiro, Matthew D Hall; Unimodal and Cross-Modal Shape Recognition. Journal of Vision 2019;19(10):300c. https://doi.org/10.1167/19.10.300c.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Thirty-two younger adults (mean age was 20.8 years) participated in a solid shape recognition task. In an initial study phase, participants were either visually or haptically familiarized with either 4 (or 6) randomly chosen replicas of naturally-shaped objects (bell peppers, Capsicum annuum). In this familiarization phase, the study objects were presented 4 separate times for 15 seconds each time. Following familiarization, 8 (or 12) bell peppers were presented to either the same or opposite modality. The participants’ task for each object was to indicate whether it was “old” (presented during the familiarization phase) or “new” (not previously presented). For the condition where the participants were familiarized with 6 objects (and tested with 12), the participants’ unimodal visual recognition performance was significantly higher than both unimodal haptic (34.5 percent higher) and cross-modal recognition performance (38.1 percent higher). When the memory demand was reduced (participants only needed to remember 4 study objects), however, performance for unimodal vision and unimodal haptics became much more comparable (87.5 versus 81.3 percent correct, respectively). In this later condition (4 study objects), an asymmetry emerged between haptic-visual and visual-haptic shape recognition, such that visual-haptic performance was superior. The current results demonstrate that visual shape memory capacity is higher than that of haptics. When the number of objects to be remembered does not exceed either modality’s storage capacity, however, human participants’ visual and haptic shape recognition performance is comparable. When recognizing the shape of objects across the sensory modalities of vision and touch, accurate performance only occurs when the objects are familiarized using vision and the resulting object recognition is tested haptically.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×