September 2019
Volume 19, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2019
Are conjunctions of motion and orientation special? Evidence from singleton interference effects
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Kevin Dent
    Department of Psychology, University of Essex
Journal of Vision September 2019, Vol.19, 309a. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/19.10.309a
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Kevin Dent; Are conjunctions of motion and orientation special? Evidence from singleton interference effects. Journal of Vision 2019;19(10):309a. https://doi.org/10.1167/19.10.309a.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Four experiments explored the mechanisms by which participants achieve efficient conjunction search, by measuring the interference caused by the presence of an irrelevant singleton, unique in either motion direction, colour, or orientation. Experiments 1 (moving vertical target amongst moving horizontal and stationary vertical distractors) and 2 (static vertical target amongst static horizontal and moving vertical distractors) investigated conjunctions of motion and orientation. Experiments 3 and 4 investigated conjunctions of colour and orientation (e.g. red vertical target amongst green vertical and red horizontal distractors). In Experiment 3 all items moved, whereas in Experiment 4 all items (except the motion singleton when present) were stationary. Participants judged whether the target was present or absent. Across all experiments orientation singletons (an item with unique orientation) caused large and robust interference. This orientation interference was strongly modulated by the singleton’s task relevant motion or colour, such that interference was much larger when the singleton shared the target’s motion or colour. The interfering effect of colour was much smaller and was not always statistically significant. Motion singletons interfered very little when the target was defined by colour but created substantial interference when the target was defined by motion. Of particular interest when searching for a stationary target amongst moving and stationary distractors, in Experiment 2, a motion singleton (an item moving in a different direction to all other items) caused substantial interference, even when it had no task relevant features. The results provide evidence for very imprecise control of search by orientation coupled with the selection of subsets of elements based on common colour or motion; sub-set search. However, motion is special in providing very strong bottom-up constraints on search such that distinctive elements within a moving group continue to cause substantial distraction even when they have no target features at all.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×