September 2019
Volume 19, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2019
Grouping does not help you to guide conjunction visual search
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Igor S. Utochkin
    National Research University Higher School of Economics, Russia
  • Vladislav A Khvostov
    National Research University Higher School of Economics, Russia
  • Jeremy M Wolfe
    Visual Attention Lab, Brigham & Women’s Hospital & Harvard Medical School, United States
Journal of Vision May 2019, Vol.19, 314c. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Igor S. Utochkin, Vladislav A Khvostov, Jeremy M Wolfe; Grouping does not help you to guide conjunction visual search. Journal of Vision 2019;19(10):314c.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

The knowledge of target features can be used to guide attention in many conjunction searches in a top-down manner. For example, in search for a red vertical line among blue vertical and red horizontal lines, observers can guide attention toward all red items and all vertical items. Items with both features would gain greater activation. It could be that attention is guided to the group of red items and the group of vertical items with items neatly divided into those with a target feature and those without. Alternatively, attention might be guided to any reddish and relatively vertical items, with no grouping. We tested whether clear, categorical groups were useful in guided search. Observers searched for color-orientation (Experiment 1) or length-orientation (Experiment 2) conjunction targets. Distractors could form two segmentable groups (e.g blue steep and red flat) or distractors could be “non-segmentable” varying from red to blue and steep to flat discouraging grouping and increasing overall heterogeneity. We found that, when the target was present, the searches were quite efficient in Experiment 1 (~9–14 ms/item) and more efficient in Experiment 2 (~0–6 ms/item). Target-present slopes were not affected by “segmentability” manipulations. However, target-absent slopes were less efficient if one of the dimensions was “non-segmentable” (especially in length-orientation conjunctions). In Experiment 3, we demonstrated that search in “non-segmentable” conjunction sets search no less and could be even more efficient than search in “non-segmentable” feature search. Our results suggest that attention is directly guided by the overlap between top-down activation signals corresponding to target features. The guidance mechanism bypasses grouping and segmentation cues that are very important in other tasks like scene parsing and object recognition.

Acknowledgement: Russian Science Foundation, grant 18-18-00334 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.