September 2019
Volume 19, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2019
Contrast scaling of perceived depth from disparity depends on both global surface configuration and disparity gradient
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Pei-Yin Chen
    Department of Psychology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
  • Chien-Chung Chen
    Department of Psychology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
    Center for Neurobiology and Cognitive Science, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
  • Christopher W Tyler
    Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA
    Division of Optometry and Visual Science, School of Health Sciences, City University, London, UK
Journal of Vision September 2019, Vol.19, 222. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/19.10.222c
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Pei-Yin Chen, Chien-Chung Chen, Christopher W Tyler; Contrast scaling of perceived depth from disparity depends on both global surface configuration and disparity gradient. Journal of Vision 2019;19(10):222. doi: https://doi.org/10.1167/19.10.222c.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

The perceived depth from disparity in random-dot stereogram depends on both luminance contrast and the spatial frequency (SF) of depth modulation (Chen et al., 2016). Here, we varied the number of cycles to investigate whether this effect may be due to local disparity gradient or global surface configuration. The test stimuli were rectangular random dot stereograms (1.27 × 3.44 degree) with three kinds of surface configuration: (a) a low SF (0.29 cy/deg) single-cycle cosine bulge, (b) a high SF (0.87 cy/deg) single-cycle cosine bulge, and (c) a high SF (0.87 cy/deg) three-cycle corrugated surface. For each surface configuration, maximum test disparity ranged from −20 to 20 arcmin while luminance contrast ranged from 5% to 80%. The observers adjusted the length of a horizontal bar to match the perceived depth in the test stimuli. In all conditions, the perceived depth for both near and far disparities was an inverted-U shape matching function of physical disparity. As in our previous study, both the perceived depth magnitude and the disparity of the peak of the matching function increased sigmoidally with luminance contrast. Both the magnitude and peak disparity were the largest for high SF single-cycle bulge followed by the low SF single-cycle bulge, and then the three-cycle corrugated surface. Our results suggest that not only local disparity gradient but also global surface configuration affects disparity processing. Such effects can be captured by a multiple-stage model in which the perceived depth is determined by the weighted average of several nonlinear contrast gain control mechanisms, each with a different disparity selectivity. Furthermore, since more than one disparity lies in the channel receptive field, the response of the cells vary with disparity gradient, hence, generating different perceived depth for different surface configurations.

Acknowledgement: MOST(Taiwan) 107-2420-H-002-029-DR 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×