December 2019
Volume 19, Issue 15
Open Access
OSA Fall Vision Meeting Abstract  |   December 2019
Aging differences in reading sentences masked with noise and improvement with text motion
Author Affiliations
  • A.E. Elsner
    Indiana University School of Optometry Bloomington, IN, USA
  • R.N. Gilbert
    Indiana University School of Optometry Bloomington, IN, USA
  • S.E. Hassan
    Indiana University School of Optometry Bloomington, IN, USA
  • R.L. Warner
    Indiana University School of Optometry Bloomington, IN, USA
  • B.P. Haggerty
    Indiana University School of Optometry Bloomington, IN, USA
  • E.J. Kollbaum
    Indiana University School of Optometry Bloomington, IN, USA
  • C.A. Clark
    Indiana University School of Optometry Bloomington, IN, USA
  • M.S. Muller
    Aeon Imaging, LLC Bloomington, IN, USA
Journal of Vision December 2019, Vol.19, 39. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/19.15.39
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      A.E. Elsner, R.N. Gilbert, S.E. Hassan, R.L. Warner, B.P. Haggerty, E.J. Kollbaum, C.A. Clark, M.S. Muller; Aging differences in reading sentences masked with noise and improvement with text motion. Journal of Vision 2019;19(15):39. https://doi.org/10.1167/19.15.39.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: We are modelling noise pattern masking as a means to simulate the decrease of S/N in aged or diseased retinas. We previously observed that text oscillation improves reading speed and error rate.

Methods: Subjects (5 females and 5 males) with spherical error 3.5 to −7.5, normal contrast sensitivity (Pelli-Robson), and no macular scotoma were divided into groups younger (31.4 + 5.0 yr) and older (62.8 + 5.8 yr). Using a digital light ophthalmoscope (DLO), we presented sentences via Maxwellian view in a 25 × 18 deg field and determined retinal locus by simultaneously capturing coplanar retinal images at 860 nm. Subjects read IU Read sentences separately, at a 1920 × 1080 pixel resolution and 20/60 Helvetica font. The text contrast (delta I/I) was 50%. The added noise had a center spatial frequency of 5.8 c/deg, and Michelson contrast 0 - 40% with, 10 sentences per condition. Each 10 - 14 word sentence was stationary or oscillating sinusoidally and horizontally, amplitude 0 - 2 deg.

Results: Errors increased with a nonlinear function of noise contrast, and the improvement of reading with text motion depended on noise contrast. With no text motion, younger subjects read faster than older ones (p=.039), but errors did not significantly differ (p=.199). Younger vs. older errors were 52.2 vs. 57.7 and 9.8 vs. 7.3 for no motion vs. motion at noise contrast 0.4.

Conclusions: Slower reading speeds but not more errors in older subjects are consistent a speed-accuracy trade-off, with motion improving reading in most subjects.

NIDILRR 90BISA000-01-00 to Matthew Muller
National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research
NIH NEI EY024186 to Matthew Muller
NIH NEI EY028499 to AEE
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×