December 2019
Volume 19, Issue 15
Open Access
OSA Fall Vision Meeting Abstract  |   December 2019
Use it before you lose it: greater efficacy of visual training for recovering contrast sensitivity in subacute cortical blindness
Author Affiliations
  • Elizabeth L. Saionz
    Translational Biomedical Science Program, University of Rochester
    Medical Scientist Training Program, University of Rochester
    Flaum Eye Institute, University of Rochester
  • Michael D. Melnick
    Dept. Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester
    Flaum Eye Institute, University of Rochester
  • Duje Tadin
    Dept. Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester
    Flaum Eye Institute, University of Rochester
    Center for Visual Science; University of Rochester
  • Krystel R. Huxlin
    Dept. Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester
    Flaum Eye Institute, University of Rochester
    Center for Visual Science; University of Rochester
Journal of Vision December 2019, Vol.19, 33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/19.15.33
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Elizabeth L. Saionz, Michael D. Melnick, Duje Tadin, Krystel R. Huxlin; Use it before you lose it: greater efficacy of visual training for recovering contrast sensitivity in subacute cortical blindness. Journal of Vision 2019;19(15):33. https://doi.org/10.1167/19.15.33.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

A hallmark of chronic (>6 months) V1 stroke in humans is loss of luminance contrast sensitivity (CS) and visual discrimination abilities in the cortically blind (CB) field. Training chronic CBs on high-contrast random dot stimuli in their blind field may restore motion discriminations, but CS remains impaired.1 Recently, we showed that some subacute CBs (<3 months) retain blind field CS at a range of spatial frequencies (SFs), particularly for drifting stimuli.2 Here, we asked whether training could further improve blind field CS, and compared its efficacy in subacute (n=5) and chronic (n=5) CBs. All subjects trained at 2 non-overlapping blind field locations on static orientation and direction discrimination tasks; Gabor (1 cpd) contrast varied within session on a 3:1 staircase. After daily home training for 3–6 months, we measured changes in static (orientation discrimination) and motion (direction discrimination) CS (0.1–10 cpd) using the qCSF. Training with drifting Gabors improved motion CS across multiple SFs in both chronic and subacute CBs, but did not recover static CS. Training with static Gabors improved both static and motion qCSFs in subacutes, but failed to elicit any improvements in chronic CBs. Our results suggest greater capacity for recovery of visual discriminations in the subacute over the chronic post-stroke period, particularly regarding static stimuli. Given the potential for trans-synaptic retrograde degeneration of parvocellular units in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus and retina, we propose that early training may take advantage of networks that are preserved immediately after V1 lesion but deteriorate absent deliberate training.

Das, A., Tadin, D., Huxlin, K. R. 2014 Beyond Blindsight: Properties of Visual Relearning in Cortically Blind Fields Journal of Neuroscience 343511652-11664https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1076-14.2014 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Saionz, Elizabeth, Tadin, Duje, Huxlin, Krystel Relative efficacy of global motion versus contrast training early after stroke for recovering contrast sensitivity in cortical blindness Journal of Vision20181810267doi: 10.1167/18.10.267 [CrossRef]
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×