October 2020
Volume 20, Issue 11
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   October 2020
A distinctive role for orientation in figure-ground separation
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Jonathan Victor
    Weill Cornell Medical College
  • Mary Conte
    Weill Cornell Medical College
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  NIH EY07977
Journal of Vision October 2020, Vol.20, 112. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.11.112
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jonathan Victor, Mary Conte; A distinctive role for orientation in figure-ground separation. Journal of Vision 2020;20(11):112. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.11.112.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Figure-ground separation can be driven by differences in luminance, contrast, orientation, and other local cues. In natural scenes, these multiple cues are intertwined. To probe how they interact, we constructed a space of synthetic textures in which these cues could be separately manipulated (Vision Res. 2015). We used these textures to create images in which the cues that defined figure and ground were varied independently. We then asked whether figure-ground separation is driven simply by the difference between figure and ground, or rather, whether the compositions of figure and ground also play a role. We focused on textures defined by their second-order statistics, as these contained both contrast and orientation information. Four orientations (cardinal and oblique) were studied. Subjects (N=3) carried out a 2-AFC task, identifying a target image that contained five randomly-positioned circular figures (25% of the total area) defined by one set of local image statistics, superimposed on a background defined by a different set of image statistics. The non-target image was statistically uniform, and matched the target image’s statistics averaged across space. Thresholds for figure-ground separation depended not only on the figure-ground difference, but also on their individual contents. However, the balance of these factors depended on the extent to which the textures were oriented. For textures that were blob-like (e.g., positive correlations on both horizontal and vertical axes), only the figure-ground difference mattered. For textures that were strongly oriented (e.g., positive correlations on the horizontal axis but negative correlations on the vertical axis), the composition of figure and ground had a large effect, influencing threshold by up to a factor of two even when figure-ground differences were held constant. In sum, figure-ground separation makes use not only of texture differences, but also of the orientation composition of figure and ground.


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.