October 2020
Volume 20, Issue 11
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   October 2020
Directional Cueing Explains Search Time Advantage for Interacting Dyads
Author Affiliations
  • Tim Vestner
    Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK
  • Katie Gray
    University of Reading, Reading, UK
  • Richard Cook
    Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK
Journal of Vision October 2020, Vol.20, 1158. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.11.1158
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Tim Vestner, Katie Gray, Richard Cook; Directional Cueing Explains Search Time Advantage for Interacting Dyads. Journal of Vision 2020;20(11):1158. doi: https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.11.1158.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

An increasing number of studies have investigated the visual perception of social interactions. A commonly used paradigm in this research is the comparison of facing and non-facing dyads in visual search, where facing dyads are found faster than non-facing dyads. This has commonly been interpreted as evidence of a specialized system for social interaction processing. In a series of experiments (N=40 each), we use this same paradigm to first replicate previous findings and then show that similar effects can be found when presenting non-social pairs of arrows. We then exclude the possibility of different causes producing these similar results by using combined face-arrow pairs, which again produced a response time advantage for pairs that directionally cue each other. These findings indicate that the search advantage found for facing dyads is a product of the directional cues present within these arrangements, not the fact that they are processed as social interactions per se. This highlights the need for existing paradigms used in this area of research to be further refined as this common manipulation not only changes the perception of social interaction but also how participants attend to these displays.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×