October 2020
Volume 20, Issue 11
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   October 2020
The functional forms of perceptual improvement: A multi-paradigm comparison of by-trial, subject-level models
Author Affiliations
  • Aaron Cochrane
    University of Wisconsin -- Madison
  • C. Shawn Green
    University of Wisconsin -- Madison
Journal of Vision October 2020, Vol.20, 1203. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.11.1203
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Aaron Cochrane, C. Shawn Green; The functional forms of perceptual improvement: A multi-paradigm comparison of by-trial, subject-level models. Journal of Vision 2020;20(11):1203. doi: https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.11.1203.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

The mathematical functions underlying learning have implications for the empirical understanding of learning phenomena as well as the underlying processes of change giving rise to learning. Most previous studies examining the functional form of learning have aggregated data across learners, learning events [trials], or both, thereby reducing the precision of parameter estimates and possibly biasing both parameters and estimates of error. Recently visual perceptual learning has been used as a model domain to demonstrate some such detrimental implications of aggregation. However, by-trial subject-level analyses have yet to be used systematically to compare specific learning functions. Here we report two perceptual learning experiments in which participants completed at least 1200 trials of training, followed by at least 400 trials of generalization, on either an oriented-line oddball-texture-detection task (n= 32) or a dot-motion delayed nonmatch-to-sample task (n=40). Tests of generalization allowed for a unified analysis of the functional form of initial learning as well as generalization thereof. We fit five nonlinear learning functions to participant- and trial-level data to determine the functional form of learning most appropriate. Learning functions were fit from two families: exponential (3-parameter exponential, 4-parameter “double” exponential, and 4-parameter Weibull) and power (3-parameter power and 4-parameter power). Information criteria were calculated for each functional form and these were compared to determine the relative evidence supporting each function. Texture-detection learning was best fit by the three-parameter exponential function in 29 participants; the remaining 3 participants were best fit by either the three-parameter power function or the Weibull function. Dot-motion learning was best fit by the 4-parameter Weibull function (30 participants) or the 3-parameter exponential function (10 participants). These results collectively repudiate the “power law of learning” while implicating, respectively, single (in texture detection) and dual (in motion discrimination) mechanisms of change during visual perceptual learning.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×