October 2020
Volume 20, Issue 11
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   October 2020
Differential effects of exogenous and endogenous covert attention on contrast sensitivity across spatial frequency and eccentricity
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Michael Jigo
    New York University
  • Marisa Carrasco
    New York University
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  NIH NEI R01-EY019693
Journal of Vision October 2020, Vol.20, 1223. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.11.1223
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Michael Jigo, Marisa Carrasco; Differential effects of exogenous and endogenous covert attention on contrast sensitivity across spatial frequency and eccentricity. Journal of Vision 2020;20(11):1223. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.11.1223.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

[Goal] Covert spatial attention (selection of spatial locations without eye movements) increases contrast sensitivity (CS) in sparse and crowded displays by enhancing the target’s representation and/or suppressing distractors. These benefits occur inflexibly for exogenous attention and flexibly for endogenous attention. To constrain visual attention models, for the first time, we systematically characterized how target enhancement and distractor suppression by exogenous and endogenous attention vary across spatial frequency (SF) and eccentricity within the same observers. [Methods] Observers performed a 2AFC orientation discrimination task. Tilted (±45°) grating(s) were displayed along the horizontal meridian on both sides of a fixation cross. In the Valid conditions, peripheral precues manipulated exogenous attention and central precues manipulated endogenous attention. In the Neutral conditions, non-informative precues distributed attention across the visual field. Response cues indicated the target. In Experiment 1, a single grating with one of 6 SFs (0.5-11 cpd) was displayed at 4 possible eccentricities (0-12°). Five levels of grating contrast encompassed the participant’s dynamic range, enabling estimates of CS. In Experiment 2, 4 gratings were displayed simultaneously with one of 8 SFs (0.5-11 cpd) and at 2 eccentricities (2°, 6°). On each trial, gratings had the same SF and their contrasts were fixed (based on initial threshold sessions) such that Neutral performance was matched across SF and eccentricity. [Results and Conclusion] In Experiment 1, Neutral and Valid CS were bandpass across SF and declined with eccentricity. In Experiment 2, Neutral performance (d′) was equated across SF and eccentricity. In both experiments, exogenous attention yielded the largest benefits for SFs above the Neutral preferred SF at each eccentricity, and more so for peripheral locations. In contrast, endogenous attention improved a broad range of lower and higher SFs. Our results highlight how these two types of covert attention distinctly shape basic perceptual dimensions across the visual field.


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.