October 2020
Volume 20, Issue 11
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   October 2020
Overestimation of Variability in Ensembles of Line Orientation, Size, and Hue
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Amelia C. Warden
    Colorado State University
  • Jessica K. Witt
    University of Nebraska at Lincoln
  • Mengzhu Fu
    Department of Psychology and Zlotowski Center for Neuroscience, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
  • Michael Dodd
    Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Psychological Sciences Research Institute and Institute of Neurosciences, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, 1348, Belgium
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  National Science Foundation
Journal of Vision October 2020, Vol.20, 1240. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.11.1240
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Amelia C. Warden, Jessica K. Witt, Mengzhu Fu, Michael Dodd; Overestimation of Variability in Ensembles of Line Orientation, Size, and Hue. Journal of Vision 2020;20(11):1240. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.11.1240.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Ensemble perception utilizes our visual system's natural abilities to extract summary statistics from sets of similar objects. Our perceptual system can accurately detect the mean of these ensembles. However, previous research has shown that our visual system is biased to overestimate variability. This bias to overestimate variability was stronger when the objects were more similar to each other. This prior research concerned variability of line orientations. We extended this work to explore whether this overestimation bias is a general phenomenon and therefore applies to other visual features as well. Using the method of adjustment, participants made judgments about the variability of line orientation, size, and hue in sets of ensembles (lines and circles). Participants viewed 9 target circles of various sizes presented one-at-a-time, then adjusted the sizes of five comparison circles presented simultaneously to match the variability in the target display. A similar task was used to assess how participants estimated variability in line orientation and hue. Participants overestimated variability, and this was true for all 3 features. Moreover, participants overestimated variability to a greater extent when there was less variability in the display for circle size (95% overestimation), line orientation (51% overestimation), and hue (155% overestimation) compared to high levels of variability (-11%, -10%, -3%, respectively). Understanding how we perceive variability in ensembles is essential when making judgments about critical information in medical images. For instance, how distributed calcifications are within a mammogram informs whether a radiologist diagnoses a patient with cancer. Further research will attempt to elucidate the mechanisms of ensemble perceptual and test the robustness of the bias to overestimate variability.


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.