October 2020
Volume 20, Issue 11
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   October 2020
The role of priors in controlling smooth pursuit eye movements of clear and noisy target motions: predictive pursuit does more than compensate for time delays
Author Affiliations
  • Jason F. Rubinstein
    Rutgers University
  • Manish Singh
    Rutgers University
  • Eileen Kowler
    Rutgers University
Journal of Vision October 2020, Vol.20, 1267. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.11.1267
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jason F. Rubinstein, Manish Singh, Eileen Kowler; The role of priors in controlling smooth pursuit eye movements of clear and noisy target motions: predictive pursuit does more than compensate for time delays. Journal of Vision 2020;20(11):1267. doi: https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.11.1267.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Smooth pursuit predicts future target motion. Recent evidence suggests that pursuit may be modeled as a form of Bayesian cue combination, with extraretinal (prior) and sensory (likelihood) cues trading off in proportion to their respective reliabilities. This can be tested by statistical manipulation of the reliabilities of prior and likelihood. We studied pursuit of clear and noisy random dot kinematograms (RDKs) with mean directions of different levels of predictability. Mean RDK direction was chosen on each trial from a Gaussian prior, SD = 10° or 45°. The direction of each dot on each frame was each chosen from a Gaussian likelihood, SD = 0° - 60°. Pursuit direction remained close to the prior early in pursuit, when functions relating eye direction to mean RDK direction showed shallow slopes. Slopes increased over time at a slower rate for noisier RDKs, reaching values close to 1 as late as 600 ms after the onset of target motion for the noisiest RDKs. Slopes increased at a faster rate with the wide prior. With the narrow prior, SDs of pursuit direction were low for all levels of RDK noise. With the wide prior, SDs of pursuit direction were higher for the noisier RDKs. Results were analogous in a related perceptual task. The results could be accounted for by a model in which the direction of pursuit over time depended on a weighted combination of an extraretinal prior and sensory likelihood, with weights depending on their relative reliabilities, and the reliability of the likelihood representation increasing over time. The bias of pursuit direction due to reliable priors was accompanied by reduced directional variability during pursuit of noisy RDKs. The results suggest that a benefit of prediction (priors) for pursuit (similar to other types of Bayesian cue combination) is to improve precision when stimuli are noisy.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×