October 2020
Volume 20, Issue 11
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   October 2020
Reduced attentional control in older adults leads to deficits in flexible prioritization of visual working memory.
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Holly A. Lockhart
    Brock University
  • Emily E. Davis
    Brock University
  • Sarah E. Henderson
    Brock University
  • Stephen M. Emrich
    Brock University
  • Karen L. Campbell
    Brock University
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  This work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Grant RGPIN-2017-03804 to KLC and Grant RGPIN-2019-04865 to SME)
Journal of Vision October 2020, Vol.20, 1269. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.11.1269
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Holly A. Lockhart, Emily E. Davis, Sarah E. Henderson, Stephen M. Emrich, Karen L. Campbell; Reduced attentional control in older adults leads to deficits in flexible prioritization of visual working memory.. Journal of Vision 2020;20(11):1269. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.11.1269.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Visual working memory has been demonstrated to be flexibly distributed across sample items depending on each item’s priority (Emrich, Lockhart, Al-Aidroos, 2017). This ability to flexibly prioritize information may depend on attentional control (Salahub, et al., in-press), which is the ability to select goal-relevant target information and suppress goal-irrelevant non-target information from entering visual working memory. To test this hypothesis, we examined flexible prioritization in a group of older adults, a population known for impairments in attentional control. Participants performed a delayed-recall task in which the number and validity of simultaneously presented spatial cues was varied. On some trials, memory load was manipulated by presenting 1, 2, or 4 cues with 100% validity. In the flexible prioritization condition, 1 item was cued with a 50% valid cue. Errors were modeled with the three-component mixture model to distinguish precision, guess-rate, and non-target errors (Bays, Catalao, & Husain, 2009). In a sample of older adults (ages 65-85), recall precision was consistently lower, and guess-rate was consistently higher than in a group of young adults (ages 18-30) across all conditions. Importantly, older adults, but not young adults, also made significantly more swap errors when flexible prioritization demands increased but memory load remained constant. This deficit was most evident under the highest flexible prioritization demands: when an un-cued item was probed. These results suggest that flexible prioritization is impaired in those with reduced attentional-control. Moreover, these findings are consistent with work showing that working memory impairments observed in older adults are due to a mis-allocation of resources (Hasher & Zacks, 1988; Gazzaley et al., 2005).


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.