October 2020
Volume 20, Issue 11
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   October 2020
Phasic pupillary response modulates object-based attentional prioritization
Author Affiliations
  • Miranda Scolari
    Texas Tech University
  • Sean O'Bryan
    Texas Tech University
Journal of Vision October 2020, Vol.20, 1278. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.11.1278
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Miranda Scolari, Sean O'Bryan; Phasic pupillary response modulates object-based attentional prioritization. Journal of Vision 2020;20(11):1278. doi: https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.11.1278.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Visual attention studies have demonstrated that the shape of space-based selection can be governed by salient object contours: when a portion of an enclosed space is cued, the selected region extends to the full enclosure. Although this form of object-based attention (OBA) is well-established, one continuing investigation focuses on whether this selection is automatic or under voluntary control. We attempt to dissociate between these alternatives by measuring phasic changes in pupil diameter—known to fluctuate with top-down attention—during a classic two-rectangle paradigm. An endogenous spatial pre-cue directed voluntary space-based attention (SBA) to one end of a rectangular frame. We manipulated the reliability of the cue, such that targets appearing at an uncued location within the frame occurred at low or moderate frequencies. OBA effects were only marginally observed when reliability of the spatial cue was low (and hence, uncued targets were moderate), and consistent with previous findings, attention selection was primarily driven by probabilistic prioritization. These results run counter to the predictions of an automatic spread account. Next, we examined pupil size time-locked to the cue display, which was expected to reflect top-down processing of the spatial cue. We reasoned that if OBA is controlled analogously to SBA, then object selection should emerge only when it is behaviorally expedient and when phasic pupil size reflects a high degree of top-down attention to the cue display. Our results bore this out. Thus, we conclude that OBA was voluntarily controlled, and furthermore show that pupil diameter may be used to interrogate attentional strategy.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×