October 2020
Volume 20, Issue 11
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   October 2020
Active task-dependent control of ocular drift during natural fixation
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Janis Intoy
    Graduate Program for Neuroscience, Boston University
    Brain & Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester
    Center for Visual Science, University of Rochester
  • Jonathan D. Victor
    Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medical College
  • Michele Rucci
    Brain & Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester
    Center for Visual Science, University of Rochester
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  Research Supported by NIH F31 EY02956, R01 EY18363, and R01 EY07977
Journal of Vision October 2020, Vol.20, 1335. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.11.1335
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Janis Intoy, Jonathan D. Victor, Michele Rucci; Active task-dependent control of ocular drift during natural fixation. Journal of Vision 2020;20(11):1335. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.11.1335.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

The human eyes are never at rest. In the so-called “fixation” periods in between saccades, the eyes wander incessantly following seemingly erratic trajectories, a motion known as ocular drift. These movements shift the image on the retina across many receptors, yielding temporal modulations that enhance high spatial frequencies. Consistent with this effect, previous studies have shown that ocular drift is beneficial for high-acuity vision. Ocular drift is widely believed to be an involuntary, random motion, presumably resulting from physiological limits in oculomotor precision. However, theoretical considerations indicate that changes in drift characteristics would be beneficial to emphasize different ranges of spatial frequencies. Do humans actively modulate their eye drifts depending on the visual task? Here we compared the characteristics of eye drifts measured during free viewing of natural images (n=28), examination of faces (n=22), reading (n=13), testing of visual acuity (n=15), and sustained fixation on a marker (n=29). Eye movements were recorded by means of a high-resolution DPI eye tracker. We report considerable changes in drift characteristics across tasks. In all cases, Brownian Motion (BM), a specific case of a random walk that well describes the motion of a particle in a fluid, proved to be a good model of ocular drift. However, the diffusion constants of motion differed significantly across tasks and were considerably smaller in the tasks that required fine spatial discriminations. Furthermore, whereas BM provided an excellent fit in high-acuity tasks, small deviations from BM were evident in other tasks, where ocular drift was better modeled by fractional Brownian Motion (fBM) with a Hurst index larger than unity. These results are consistent with predictions based on the frequency content of the luminance modulations delivered to the retina in the various tasks. They show that humans actively tune ocular drift according to the task at hand.


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.