October 2020
Volume 20, Issue 11
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   October 2020
Investigating how illusory objects are represented in visual working memory
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Elliot E.C. Ping
    The Ohio State University
  • Lisa M. Heisterberg
    The Ohio State University
  • Ayala S. Allon
    The Ohio State University
  • Andrew B. Leber
    The Ohio State University
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  NSF BCS-1632296 (AL), NSF BCS-1848939 (AL)
Journal of Vision October 2020, Vol.20, 1467. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.11.1467
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Elliot E.C. Ping, Lisa M. Heisterberg, Ayala S. Allon, Andrew B. Leber; Investigating how illusory objects are represented in visual working memory. Journal of Vision 2020;20(11):1467. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.11.1467.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Visual Working Memory (VWM) is an online workspace that holds a limited amount of information, about 3-4 objects, in an active state for a short period of time (Luck & Vogel, 1997). A way to cope with such capacity limitations is to group and parse information into integrated units in VWM. Gestalt grouping cues, such as illusory objects, have previously been shown to improve VWM performance (Allon et al., 2018, Gao, et al, 2016; Peterson, et al, 2015). While illusory objects clearly lead to behavioral improvements, the question of how these improvements arise remains unanswered. Here, we ask whether the behavioral benefits derived from an illusory object (eg., a Kanizsa triangle) result from a reduction in storage demands in VWM. We recorded EEG while subjects performed a bilateral change-detection task, with memory arrays configured in four conditions: 1 item, 3 items forming a Kanizsa triangle, 3 proximity grouped items, and 3 ungrouped items. The number of items held in VWM was assessed via the contralateral delay activity (CDA). We found a behavioral performance benefit for the Kanizsa triangle condition, replicating other studies. However, the CDA amplitude for the Kanizsa condition was not significantly different from the 3 proximity grouped and 3 ungrouped item conditions. These results suggest that the behavioral benefits derived from the illusory object Kanizsa triangle are not a result of reduced storage demands in VWM. Future follow-up studies will aim to further delineate how the behavioral benefits of the Kanizsa triangle arise.


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.