October 2020
Volume 20, Issue 11
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   October 2020
Tracking spatial and non-spatial working memory representations coded in human oscillatory brain activity
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Kamryn Waldrop
    UC Santa Barbara
  • Tom Bullock
    UC Santa Barbara
  • Mary MacLean
    UC Santa Barbara
  • Barry Giesbrecht
    UC Santa Barbara
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  URCA Grant and US Army Contract W911NF-19-0026
Journal of Vision October 2020, Vol.20, 1724. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.11.1724
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Kamryn Waldrop, Tom Bullock, Mary MacLean, Barry Giesbrecht; Tracking spatial and non-spatial working memory representations coded in human oscillatory brain activity. Journal of Vision 2020;20(11):1724. doi: https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.11.1724.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

The spatial distribution of alpha-band activity across the scalp measured by electroencephalography (EEG) can be used to track specific spatial representations of stimuli held in working memory (WM; Foster et al. 2016; MacLean et al. 2019). Here, we tested the extent to which spatially specific information is maintained in WM when it is no longer task-relevant. Participants (n=7) performed a simple delayed recall task in which a circular stimulus was briefly presented (250ms) at locations on an imaginary circle around fixation. After a retention interval (1750 ms), participants recalled the task relevant feature of the initial memorandum. In different blocks, participants recalled either the stimulus location (requiring maintenance of spatial information during the retention period) or color (maintenance of spatial information not required) while EEG was recorded. Precision was lower when recalling color compared to spatial location (p<.05) and guess -rates were not different (p>.05). We used an inverted encoding analysis using EEG alpha power to estimate the spatially selective response throughout the trial. The spatially selective response was quantified using the slope of the response profile. We observed a robust stimulus representation (greater positive slope) during the stimulus presentation phase of the trial in both the spatial and color WM conditions. This was followed by a sustained spatially specific response in the spatial memory condition throughout the entire 1750 ms retention period, whereas in the color memory condition the spatially specific representation was maintained for ~750 ms post-stimulus. Together, these effects demonstrate that spatial information is encoded in the alpha band in combination with other task-relevant features, but this information degrades if spatial location is task-irrelevant.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×