October 2020
Volume 20, Issue 11
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   October 2020
Image predictors of visual localization in natural scenes
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Anna Kosovicheva
    Northeastern University
  • Koushik Sridhar
    Northeastern University
    North Carolina School of Science and Mathematics
  • Peter J Bex
    Northeastern University
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  This work was supported by funding from the National Institutes of Health (R01 EY029713 to P. J. B. and F32 EY028814 to A. K.).
Journal of Vision October 2020, Vol.20, 183. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.11.183
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Anna Kosovicheva, Koushik Sridhar, Peter J Bex; Image predictors of visual localization in natural scenes. Journal of Vision 2020;20(11):183. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.11.183.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Accurate visual localization is essential for our ability to interact with the world. Previous work has shown that the perceived location of an object is influenced by its surrounding context (e.g., frames of reference, landmarks, motion), but less is known about which image statistics influence localization errors within natural scenes. We measured the influence of local image statistics (luminance, edges, object boundaries, and saliency) on perceptual reports of location. On each trial, 10 observers reported the location of a brief (50 ms) Gaussian target (σ=0.85º) superimposed on a 48º by 37º photograph of a natural scene at one of three eccentricities (5º, 7.5º, 10º) and one of 24 angular locations. Observers reported the target’s perceived location by adjusting the position of a cursor. For each statistic, we calculated the difference between the image value at the physical center of the Gaussian target and the value at its reported center, and averaged the resulting difference scores across 720 trials. To isolate image-specific effects, these difference scores were compared to a randomly-permuted null distribution, that was calculated by shuffling the mapping between the response coordinates and different images across all trials. The observed difference scores indicated that responses were significantly biased toward darker regions, luminance edges, object boundaries, and areas of high saliency (p-values <. 001; αB = .006), with low shared variance between these measures (R2 < .02). In a second experiment, 12 observers made reflexive saccades to the same targets. The results showed that the same image statistics were associated with observers’ saccade errors, despite large differences in reaction time for the two experiments (987 vs. 239 ms). Together, these results indicate that local spatial statistics influence localization in natural images, and that these biases are independent of response modality.


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.