October 2020
Volume 20, Issue 11
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   October 2020
Opposite effects of expectation on motion perception and anticipatory pursuit eye movements
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Xiuyun Wu
    University of British Columbia
  • Austin Rothwell
    University of British Columbia
  • Miriam Spering
    University of British Columbia
  • Anna Montagnini
    Aix-Marseille University and CNRS
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  This work was supported by a University of British Columbia four-year fellowship to X.W., an Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery Grant and Accelerator Supplement to M.S., and an "APPVIS", PICS-CNRS grant to A.M..
Journal of Vision October 2020, Vol.20, 567. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.11.567
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Xiuyun Wu, Austin Rothwell, Miriam Spering, Anna Montagnini; Opposite effects of expectation on motion perception and anticipatory pursuit eye movements. Journal of Vision 2020;20(11):567. doi: https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.11.567.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Smooth pursuit eye movements and visual motion perception rely on the integration of current sensory signals with past experience. Expectation derived from past experience can bias perception and even trigger smooth pursuit in anticipation of target onset (Maus, Potapchuk, Watamaniuk, & Heinen, 2015). However, it is still unclear whether perceptual and pursuit biases are similarly affected by expectation. Here we compare biases in perception and anticipatory pursuit by probing both responses in a direction discrimination task. Observers (n=9 human adults) viewed random-dot kinematograms (RDKs) under different expectations of motion direction (right/left) while their eye position was recorded (Eyelink 1000). Context trials with high-coherence motion were used to build up a prior expectation of motion direction. Probability of rightward motion differed between blocks (50, 70, and 90%). Interleaved perceptual trials with low-coherence motion (0-15%) probed biases in direction discrimination and anticipatory pursuit magnitude. Observers tracked RDK motion with their eyes and reported perceived direction via button press. In experiment 1, motion coherence in context trials was 100%; in experiment 2 coherence was reduced to 20-30% to control for possible motion aftereffects due to sensory adaptation. Results showed that anticipatory pursuit was aligned with the expected direction (attraction bias). Perceptual judgments in low-coherence trials followed the direction opposite to the expected direction (repulsion bias). The size of both biases scaled monotonically with direction probability. Reducing motion coherence in context trials in exp. 2 significantly reduced anticipatory pursuit magnitude (e.g., velocity gain F(1,8)=11.61, p=.01). However, reducing coherence did not reduce perceptual bias (F(1,8)=1.44, p=.26), indicating that low-level sensory adaptation is unlikely to be the cause of the opposite bias in perception. We conclude that the repulsion bias in motion direction discrimination might be driven by higher-level processing and integration of motion signals.


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.