October 2020
Volume 20, Issue 11
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   October 2020
What affects fixations during image viewing? Working memory load, saliency, and ADHD-like traits
Author Affiliations
  • Astrid Priscilla Martinez Cedillo
    University of Essex, United Kingdom
  • Kevin Dent
    University of Essex, United Kingdom
  • Tom Foulsham
    University of Essex, United Kingdom
Journal of Vision October 2020, Vol.20, 670. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.11.670
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Astrid Priscilla Martinez Cedillo, Kevin Dent, Tom Foulsham; What affects fixations during image viewing? Working memory load, saliency, and ADHD-like traits. Journal of Vision 2020;20(11):670. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.11.670.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Load theory of selective attention argues that high cognitive load impedes distractor avoidance (see, Lavie, 2005). We report three experiments investigating the effect of working memory (WM) load on selective attention. In our first behavioural study, we successfully replicated two experiments showing that higher WM load increases the effects of distractors in a flanker or singleton paradigm (Lavie et al 2004; Lavie & De Fockert, 2005). Considering these results, we then investigated visual attention during the viewing of complex scenes (featuring social and non-social objects), while manipulating WM load. We also explored the relationship between these tasks and ADHD-like traits, given that these traits are associated with increased distraction. In the image viewing task, we measured the degree to which fixations targeted each of two crucial elements: (1) a social element (a person in the scene) and (2) a non-social object which was edited to be high or low saliency. We tested the hypothesis that high WM load would lead to increased capture by the salient distractor. In contrast, attending to the social item might require more top-down resources and so be disrupted by WM load. Our results suggest that during image viewing the social object was fixated to a greater degree than the other object (regardless of saliency). While, there was a relationship between the degree of ADHD-like traits and performance on the memory task, WM load did not seem to affect scanning in scenes. Such findings suggest that attending to a social area in complex stimuli is surprisingly not dependent on the availability of top-down resources.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×