October 2020
Volume 20, Issue 11
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   October 2020
Differences between online addition and subtraction in visual working memory
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Maya Ankaoua
    Tel-Aviv University
  • Roy Luria
    Tel-Aviv University
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  Minducate Center, Sagol School of Neuroscience
Journal of Vision October 2020, Vol.20, 722. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.11.722
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Maya Ankaoua, Roy Luria; Differences between online addition and subtraction in visual working memory. Journal of Vision 2020;20(11):722. doi: https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.11.722.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Visual working memory (VWM) is responsible for both storage and processing of information. Nevertheless, most of previous research has focused on the maintenance part. While it has been shown that VWM devotes more capacity when maintaining more information, the current work investigated VWM capacity during mental subtraction and addition processes, while keeping the number of encoded objects constant. In the addition experiment, two shapes were presented. In the maintenance condition, participants were asked to press a key when they finished encoding and maintaining both shapes. In the addition condition, participants had to combine the two shapes into one integrated shape and press a key when this addition process was completed. Then, another shape was presented and participants were asked to indicate whether it was similar to one of the two initial shapes in the maintenance condition, or similar to the outcome of the integrated shape in the addition condition. Similarly, in the subtraction experiment, participants were asked to either maintain two shapes, or to subtract one from the other and maintain the result. We collected EEG data and used the Contralateral Delay Activity (CDA) as an indicator of VWM involvement. In both experiments, behavioral results showed that adding or subtracting was more difficult (longer RTs and lower accuracy rates) than just maintain the items. The CDA showed a higher amplitude both in the adding and subtracting conditions as compared to the maintenance condition. This suggests that while performing the addition or subtraction processes, more VWM is involved compared to when we simply maintain the same amount of information. This can be due to intermediate products we create and maintain while performing the addition or subtraction.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×